SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SOROS who wrote (52894)8/6/2004 10:38:45 AM
From: DayTraderKidd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
No argument from me about clinton's morals. I don't think Kerry is nearly as morally bankrupt as clinton. Although I don't think Kerry has nearly as strong a foundation as Bush I don't think Bush is working for our country. I think he has to many ties to the likes of the saudi royal family and the ben laden family to really have our countries best interest at heart so for me 4 years of Kerry is a fair trade off.

As for the precidence Clinton has set it makes me think of the precidence Bush has set. I certainly am in favor of preemption. But Bush abused that and it makes me wonder in the years to come what other countries will adopt and abuse preemption.



To: SOROS who wrote (52894)8/6/2004 1:59:25 PM
From: denizen48  Respond to of 89467
 
I never blamed Clinton for lying about sex. Bush lied about matters of state, public matters, to the point where yes, we have no more compass to tell the truth.
If you can't see a difference between the two, what's the use of talking to you?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News