Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : SI Member Vote 2004/SubjectMarks Only For Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: richardred who wrote (39)	8/7/2004 10:34:53 AM
From: mr.mark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 812

see the number drop.... well i'm going to unbookmark the thread for now and come back closer to the election

To: richardred who wrote (39)	8/7/2004 10:41:51 AM
From: Rarebird	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 812

<In General, am I wrong to assume to that Republican want less gov't in their lives and Democrats more!> Yes, I think you are wrong! Defense spending represents a tremendous expenditure on the part of gov't. The question of whether this expenditure is needed represents an entirely different topic from what you expressed in your thread header. And in all honesty, I don't feel like being flamed for giving my honest opinion here. Again, SI is the last place in the world I'd want to receive political analyses.