To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10346 ) 8/8/2004 3:12:46 PM From: arun gera Respond to of 116555 >it is not a pure zero-sum game they take 100 points, we get back 5-7 your math sucks you seem lame in the analysis> Any explanation/links about your numbers? They take 100 points, we get back 5-7. >MishMan put it well, where are the jobs?> There could be many reasons for lack of job growth. Blaming it on outsourcing without enough data is not a good enough explanation. Could it be that US companies have lost their nerve to invest after the last recesssion? It was only a few years ago that the job market was so hot that US was shipping 100,000 programmers per year from abroad. Some of your numbers: >for every 1 million jobs exported, they purchase a GE electric turbine (long way to go on that one)> Would that mean China has taken away 250 million jobs?pepei.pennnet.com GE Hydro enjoys a strong presence in China, where over 250 GE hydro turbines have been installed for projects across the country. >offshore firms do buy our IT equipment, but much of it is made in Asia, check the names behind China new plants like Lucent, and almost all PC's are made in Taiwan nowadays employees of foreign firms do buy home computers (made in Asia), cellphones (made in Asia), televisions (made in Asia or Mexico) do you do any research at all?> Yes. And they probably buy a lot of semiconductor manufacturing equipment from US manufacturers. So the overseas players play in the commodity market. Take huge risks for small rewards. While US corporations like Microsoft, Intel, and Qualcomm don't know what to do with their money. This game has been played before in garments. The foreign makers take risks for low profits, always risking their money and their employees jobs. US maker buys dirt cheap. Attach a designer label like Donna Karan, Calvin Klein. And a $5 item becomes a $50 item with the $45 taken over by the designer, US Ad companies, media, and retailers. And the rest of the world fights to make money on the $5. -Arun