Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert O who wrote (178997)	8/10/2004 5:32:45 PM
From: hueyone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

<<Wherever there is big big money involved folks always look back and wonder what the heck took so long for such obvious schemes to be outed and acted on.>> Exactly. And the really sad part about the no expense stock option scheme is that companies are using shareholder money to lobby against shareholder's interest (imo) to keep this scheme going. What an incredible scam---use your adversaries money to fight against them. If Craig Barret really had any real sense of ethics, he would have stopped lobbying Congress to pass this ridiculous new law once his shareholder/owners voted to expense stock options. (The new law would result in a ridiculously small portion of stock options ever be expensed.) JMO, Huey