Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (42034)	8/10/2004 8:08:29 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

GO here to find out the truth: factcheck.org for a non-partisan assessment

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (42034)	8/10/2004 8:14:54 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

I think the best thing to do with the waste is for each nuclear plant to build a secure disposal site at their plant. That would remove the danger of transporting the waste long distances. All nuclear plants have been sited in geologically stable sites. They are already terrorist targets, so they need to be guarded anyway. New nuclear plants could do the same. I think, in part this is just NIMBYism - the people with the plants want the energy, but they want the waste somewhere else.