Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (59482)	8/11/2004 10:09:41 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793843

He has put that forth as a major reason for us to elect him President. If the book is truthful, the foundation of his campaign is fraudulent. He has, although I imagine that's largely a defensive move, not a stand he would have taken absent charges of wimpiness. Since he has made a big deal about it, though, it seems reasonable to challenge him on that score. I have no issue with folks questioning his credibility as a war hero. But voters are under no obligation to vote for or against him based on his proposed reason for their electing him. Their reasons are based on what's important to them. My question is, as a voter, what weight should I put on this?