SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (602967)8/12/2004 2:09:01 PM
From: Gus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
More people (~2.2M) died in the 10 years after the US left Vietnam in 1975 than during the first 10 years of the war (~1.1M including 58,000 US GIs) started by a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress in 1965.

The dominoes really didn't stop falling until Afghanistan in 1979. By then, however, the seeds of Islamic extremism had already taken firm root, thanks to the incompetence and weakness of Jimmy Carter. The Ayatollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein, for example, came to official power during the Carter administration and there was nothing a hapless Jimmy Carter could do about it except to beg Saddam Hussein, through the Saudi King, if he could please hurt Iran's feelings for taking our hostages.



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (602967)8/12/2004 2:17:25 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
We fought a "sensitive war" once. It was called Vietnam. We lost it.

Do you remember the daily 'body count' of the enemy during 'Nam by Johnson/MacNamara? Now the daily 'body count', of the left wing liberal ghouls, is of our military in Iraq. They are salivating, waiting for the one thousandth to fall. Watch the news papers headline the event, and the ghouls on this thread scream in triumph. Disgusting it will be. But anyone following the Non-Hero John Kerry is capable of anything. I wait for their reaction.

KM



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (602967)8/12/2004 2:18:06 PM
From: Karin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Yes, I remember that.

Our Soldiers were not allowed to use full force and they were restricted to use defoliants etc.

It would have made a great difference in the outcome of the war.

We just should have fought with "one-armed soldiers"
same thing.

If you start a war, go for the max and go for the win.
Never herd of such "wimpy"talk: "Sensitive war"