SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rock_nj who wrote (7727)8/12/2004 2:58:30 PM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
I'm saying if one is in favor [of torture], then I don't see why they'd have a problem being a test subject?

What's to test?

Unless they are a complete hyprocrite [sic] which I suspect most of the torture advocates are.

If an individual advocated - or pursued - the hurling of individuals off of the public welfare rolls, should they subseqently forfeit their job? Their car, their home?

LPS5



To: Rock_nj who wrote (7727)8/13/2004 2:05:08 PM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20039
 
If George Bush and his henchmen were found guilty of the part they played in engineering 9/11, and the murder of 3000 Americans, would you be against their being placed in front of a firing squad for treason?

For some crimes only a death sentence will balance the books.

<<<it just doesn't make any sense in a civilized society>>>

Actually, it only makes sense in a civilized society. When a society fails to accept responsibility for holding criminals accountable for actions committed against society, that society ceases to be civilized. The end result is a criminal rule with honest citizens in constant danger from their criminal acts, which isn't a very far cry from where most population centers in America are today. When citizens fail to take responsibility for their own mutual protection, civilization is the first casualty.