Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (53365)	8/12/2004 6:47:28 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

I cannot offer you any more evidence that what I have all ready given you. I would imagine that... 'scuze me! YOU declared that it is a proven fact that the state troopers who provided the reports LIED and that they had retracted their statements. What "FACTS" prove the troopers lied for profit? That should be a simple task. Facts are facts, when they are validated they prove a point. This should be a sinch for you after having read so much on the subject. If they did, then they committed the most dishonorable act of slander I can imagine. Not to mention that their testimony could potentially have been used to help unseat the President of the United States. If it was false this could even be seen as an act of treason. I simply asked for your facts that prove YOUR ALLEGATIONS. It is an issue of honor that you must rise to, if you are an honorable person. "I would imagine that if what was published was untrue that there would be libel suit involved and either the author or publishers would have to pay. That is simply a bad assumption on your part. In a case of libel, the claimant must have some claim for relief, or there is no case. The State Troopers and author would have to claim that they have lost a significant amount of money because of the statement made in your book references. In fact, that could not be done, since there are no reports of them having lost jobs over the issue and they have benefitted significantly from the payments received as a result of the reports. So... just the facts ma'm. If you cannot produce them, or retract your allegations, the dishonor is yours.