Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (53439)	8/13/2004 6:55:16 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

"You don't bleed blood.." Oh my. I'll have to get back to you when the giggles give me a break.

To: Suma who wrote (53439)	8/13/2004 7:17:53 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

"As usual you attack the messenger rather than the SOURCE of where the message originated. Sorry, but that statement is factually inaccurate. You declared that it is a "proven fact" that the State Troopers lied and that they retracted their allegations. That is where THE MESSAGE was boldly proclaimed by you. The sources of YOUR evidence do not substantiate your claim, they simply state an unproven and obviously biased opinion. Clinton states that what the reports said was "untrue". Well, we all know about clinton's use of terms. If challenged his response is bound to be 'Depends.' He might have been refering to the report calling the cars 'squad cars' instead of 'patrol cars' or some such convoluted thing. I simply asked you to provide the evidence that proved this as a fact. You told me to go read some books even though you could not point to the event or information that proves YOUR ALLEGATIONS as fact. I can only conclude that you have no such facts and no such thing has been proven and that you are too dishonorable to own up to your mistake. And the clintonian phenomenon continues to boggle me. You being a great example of that.