Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (18925)	8/14/2004 2:57:57 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

You're so witty. Any GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth you'd like to discuss or are you just here to behave like a juvenile? Why do you think the administration would lie about whether they knew of the warrants for chalabi's arrest in advance?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (18925)	8/14/2004 2:59:13 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Why do you think shrub lied to Larry King about what he said on the aircraft carrier?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (18925)	8/14/2004 3:02:05 PM
From: Doug R	Respond to of 173976

Why do you think cheney lied about lying? BORGER: "Well, let's get to Mohamed Atta for a minute because you mentioned him, as well. You have said in the past that it was, quote, 'pretty well confirmed.'" CHENEY: “No, I never said that.” - CNBC, 6/20/04 FACT: “It's been pretty well confirmed that [Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.” - Vice President Dick Cheney, 12/9/01 “There is no evidence that the alleged leader of the Sept. 11 hijackers, Mohamed Atta, met in April 2001 with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague, a finding that eliminates a once-suggested link between the terrorist attacks and the government of President Saddam Hussein, according to a senior administration official.” - Washington Post, 5/1/02

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (18925)	8/14/2004 3:07:33 PM
From: Doug R	Respond to of 173976

Why did rumsfeld lie about lying? Schieffer: Let me just ask you this, if they did not have these weapons of mass destruction, though, granted all of that is true, why then did they pose an immediate threat to us, to this country? Rumsfeld: You and a few other critics are the only people I've heard use the phrase immediate threat. I didn't, the president didn't. And it's become kind of folklore that that's what's happened. "No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people, and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq." ---19 Sep 2002 Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to the Senate Armed Services Commitee: