Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (60589)	8/15/2004 10:51:40 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793888

Daniel Pipes is somewhat lessened after reading such a distorted article My fault. The last part about "Sharia" was added on from another article, since it was on the same subject. I should have made it clear it was separate.

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (60589)	8/15/2004 2:48:59 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793888

Alastair.....Is there a link to a major media of Canada that shows the PM's exact wording on this....? Hopefully you will have one. TIA! Of course, there is another answer to this....The Muslim women wouldn't have to show their facial feature to have the photos done....IF they don't want permanent resident status, or if they don't want to go through Customs --in or out-- of Canada or the US..... The issue in the second part of the article actually was about the photographs required for permanent resident status. Pipes tries to leave the impression that Prime Minister Paul Martin wishes to let a Muslim women keep her hijab on to the point of hiding her facial features. What the PM actually wrote confirmed that Immigration Canada does not require the head covering to be completely removed, but for security purposes, all facial features must be visible for the photographs.