SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (5633)8/17/2004 3:26:43 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
Kerry appoints Mel Levine top Mideast adviser
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Tugend, THE JERUSALEM POST Aug. 16, 2004
------------------------------------------------------------------------

When Washington goes its own way and disrespects its allies, it hurts not only the United States, but Israel as well, insists Mel Levine.

"Whenever America is diminished in the eyes of the world, it does Israel no favor," said Levine, who as John Kerry's newly appointed top adviser on the Middle East is expected to play a major role in shaping the Democrat's policy on region.

During an interview in his law office, the former congressman from West Los Angeles was addressing himself to concerns that Kerry's advocacy of a multilateral US foreign policy might mean greater pressure on Israel for concessions to the Palestinians and surrounding Arab states.

Not so, said Levine, "but if we cannot convince Europe, Russia and other countries to keep nuclear weapons away from Iran, to fight terrorism, and to exert greater leverage on Arab countries, we will fail," and thereby weaken Israel.

To gauge Kerry's attitude toward Israel, one need only look at his votes during 20 years in the US Senate, according to Levine.

"By every rating and criterion, Kerry's votes have shown 100 percent solid support for Israel," he said. "That's well understood in his home state of Massachusetts, but not yet throughout the rest of the country."

Levine's appointment as chair of the Kerry campaign's Middle East Policy Working Group has been hailed by Jewish spokesmen and organizations as a reassurance that Israel's interests will have an eloquent voice in Kerry's inner circle.

As congressman and member of the House foreign affairs committee from 1983 to 1993, Levine was among Israel's strongest supporters. His clashes with former Secretary of State James Baker on the Middle East policies of the first President Bush have become part of Washington folklore.
Representing the US, Levine has also had considerable experience in dealing with the Arab side.

At Vice President Al Gore's request, he served as co-president, with Arab-American James Zogby, of Builders for Peace, a private sector initiative to make the West Bank economy more competitive that, despite its good intentions, largely failed.

Following the 1998 Wye Plantation accords, Levine chaired the US-Israel-Palestinian "anti-incitement" task force. He learned from this experience that incitement has to be confronted directly and aggressively, a lesson he is passing on to Kerry.

Until recently, he served on the board of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), but has cut his activities in advocacy groups since becoming chairman of the non-political Community Relations Committee of the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles.

The Middle East Policy Working Group, said Levine, is not a formal committee with regular meetings and joint policy formulations. "I will be seeking informal and informed input from other members, and then render my advice," Levine said.

He also believes that with Kerry's long service on the Senate foreign relations committee and his global outlook, "he won't need much policy guidance. Unlike other presidents, whose previous experiences were as state governors, Kerry will hit the ground running."

When Jewish Republicans and Democrats argue the merits of their presidential candidates, and whether sizeable chunks of the overwhelmingly Democratic Jewish community will defect this time to President Bush, Republicans stress the incumbent's pro-Israel record. Democrats – while not conceding that their man is any less pro-Israel – emphasize the Bush administration's perceived domestic policy failures.

Edward Sanders, an elder statesman of the Los Angeles and national Jewish communities, and who served as President Jimmy Carter's Middle East and Jewish relations adviser, has no doubt about his priorities. "I couldn't vote for a candidate who is good for Israel and bad on everything else," said the veteran Democrat and Kerry supporter. "What's good for a strong and respected United States is good for Israel."

Levine acknowledges that the Democrats may not quite retain the 80 percent of the Jewish vote they got in the last presidential election, when they fielded Al Gore, a longtime friend of the Jewish community, and Jewish vice presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman. But with Bush and Kerry equally pro-Israel, in Levine's view, Jewish voters will come down overwhelmingly on Kerry's side on a wide range of domestic issues.
"On the top of the list is church-state separation, and to say that the present administration has blurred the line is a significant understatement," said Levine.

Other issues where Levine perceives serious Bush weaknesses include privacy rights, energy independence, woman's right to choose, health care, the environment, and preserving social services.

Veteran Democratic Rep. Howard Berman of California has known Levine for some 27 years and sees the latter's appointment as "an obvious statement by Kerry that he will be a strong supporter of Israel and its security interests.

Another longtime colleague, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Los Angeles) praised Kerry's ability to "translate his views into public policy." In a survey by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, leaders of major Jewish organizations such as AIPAC, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations overwhelmingly endorsed the choice of Levine, though some noted that in the end it would be up to Kerry to act on Levine's recommendations.
Levine said he would be an "active advocate" in the Kerry campaign, but declined to speculate on a future role in a Kerry administration.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (5633)8/19/2004 3:48:13 PM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
Iran warns of preemptive strike to prevent attack on nuclear sites

Wed Aug 18, 4:14 PM ET
On Yahoo! News

DOHA (AFP) - Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani warned that Iran might launch a preemptive strike against US forces in the region to prevent an attack on its nuclear facilities.

"We will not sit (with arms folded) to wait for what others will do to us. Some military commanders in Iran are convinced that preventive operations which the Americans talk about are not their monopoly," Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera TV when asked if Iran would respond to an American attack on its nuclear facilities.

"America is not the only one present in the region. We are also present, from Khost to Kandahar in Afghanistan; we are present in the Gulf and we can be present in Iraq," said Shamkhani, speaking in Farsi to the Arabic-language news channel through an interpreter.

"The US military presence (in Iraq) will not become an element of strength (for Washington) at our expense. The opposite is true, because their forces would turn into a hostage" in Iranian hands in the event of an attack, he said.

Shamkhani, who was asked about the possibility of an American or Israeli strike against Iran's atomic power plant in Bushehr, added: "We will consider any strike against our nuclear installations as an attack on Iran as a whole, and we will retaliate with all our strength.

"Where Israel is concerned, we have no doubt that it is an evil entity, and it will not be able to launch any military operation without an American green light. You cannot separate the two."

A commander of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards was quoted in the Iranian press earlier Wednesday as saying that Tehran would strike the Israeli reactor at Dimona if Israel attacks the Islamic republic's own burgeoning nuclear facilities.

"If Israel fires one missile at Bushehr atomic power plant, it should permanently forget about Dimona nuclear center, where it produces and keeps its nuclear weapons, and Israel would be responsible for the terrifying consequence of this move," General Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr warned.

Iran's controversial bid to generate nuclear power at its plant being built at Bushehr is seen by arch-enemies Israel and the United States as a cover for nuclear weapons development.

The latest comments mark an escalation in an exchange of threats between Israel and Iran in recent weeks, leading to speculation that there may be a repeat of Israel's strike against Iraqi nuclear facilities at Osirak in 1981.

Iran insists that its nuclear intentions are peaceful, while pointing at its enemy's alleged nuclear arsenal, which Israel neither confirms nor denies possessing.

Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera it was not possible "from a practical standpoint" to destroy Iran's nuclear programs because they are the product of national skills "which cannot be eliminated by military means."

He also warned that Iran would consider itself no longer bound by its commitments to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the event of an attack.

"The execution of such threats (to attack Iran's nuclear installations) would mean that our cooperation with the IAEA led to feeding information about our nuclear facilities to the attacking side, which (in turn) means that we would no longer be bound by any of our obligations" to the nuclear watchdog, he said.

Diplomats said in Vienna Tuesday that the IAEA would not say in a report next month whether Iran's nuclear activities are of a military nature, nor will it recommend bringing the case before the UN Security Council.

The IAEA board is due to deliver the report on Iran's nuclear activities during a meeting at the organization's headquarters in Vienna from September 13 after the last of a group of IAEA inspectors returned from Iran last week.

The UN's nuclear agency is conducting a major probe into Iran's bid to generate electricity through nuclear power.

The Islamic republic has agreed to temporarily suspend uranium enrichment pending the completion of the IAEA probe, but is working on other parts of the fuel cycle and has recently resumed making centrifuges used for enrichment.

news.yahoo.com