Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (60912)	8/17/2004 4:53:41 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793707

<font color=blue>"And there is no way the CIA goes to a green LT and coordinates directly with him."<font color=black> That is something that no one in the media has yet to point out. Kerry was a greenhorn Swift Boat commander. We know his history prior to his service, so there is nothing that would give credence to the theory that he would be approached by the CIA or any branch of the service for illegal, clandestine operations into Cambodia with or without any contact with Kerry's superior officers. Why would they want someone with not even two months of time in a Swift Boat to run covert operations? Then consider that Kerry repeatedly said that incursions into Cambodia by Swift Boats, ET AL, were common practice. By now, there would be all kinds of info out there on the internet to corroborate that claim, yet there is none. And there would also be a large number of incidents where boats & crews would have been captured in Cambodia where their Gov't would have been screaming bloody murder with boats & crews as evidence of these illegal incursions. Again, it never happened. BTW, Kerry would have also had plenty of evidence available to prove that we left numerous POW's behind, when he did his Senate investigation that turned up no evidence per Kerry.