SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (60916)8/16/2004 6:02:39 PM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793801
 
tax loopholes are not unlawful they are the law. for some reason congress voted in these exceptions. perhaps about thousands of reasons. some stupid , some as an incentive for risk investment.



To: Lane3 who wrote (60916)8/16/2004 6:26:19 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793801
 
Good points - I don't really know what crosses the line about loopholes in environmental laws, but agree in principle that it's an "eye of the beholder" thing, usually.

The McGreevy resignation is another good case in point. I don't like the political effects of his delaying the effective date of his resignation, but if it's legal, so what?

Things like this only matter if you are contemplating a long relationship where cooperation from the other side is necessary for your goals.

I am looking forward to an upcoming seminar, "Ethics for Bankruptcy Attorneys Taught by Bankruptcy Judges." You may have heard some lawyers scoff at getting a bad reputation among judges, but they never scoff about judges thinking they are unethical. Being thought of as abrasive, overbearing, overaggressive, this is tolerable, but being thought of as sleazy and untrustworthy is not tolerable.

Pushing the envelope can backfire if you get a reputation for being untrustworthy.



To: Lane3 who wrote (60916)8/16/2004 8:00:49 PM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793801
 
What's wrong with using the three purple-heart loophole to get out of Nam?

I see nothing wrong with using the tax loopholes you wrote about as long as one is legitimately eligible for them.

Likewise I see nothing wrong with using three PHs to get out of Nam on a loophole and don't understand why you bothered to ask that question.

Were you were creating a little demoesque smoke screen?

Because I do see a helluva lot wrong with manipulating the system to get three unearned Purple Hearts so you could use the PH loophole to get out of nam.



To: Lane3 who wrote (60916)8/16/2004 10:00:03 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793801
 
I guess you would have to ask all the people who got 3 or more purple hearts and did not go home - which is ALL OF THEM except Kerry- since apparently he is the only sailor in that period who took advantage of it. There is something stomach turning about it when you look at it like that.

What's wrong with using the three purple-heart loophole to get out of Nam?