SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (KKD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cisco who wrote (900)8/16/2004 9:07:36 PM
From: Brasco One  Respond to of 1001
 
major ouchie for kkd here,,,



To: Cisco who wrote (900)9/3/2004 12:07:36 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1001
 
WSJ -- Ovens Are Cooling At Krispy Kreme As Woes Multiply.

September 3, 2004

Sticky Situation

Ovens Are Cooling At Krispy Kreme As Woes Multiply

Lower Profit, Slower Growth, Informal SEC Probe Beset A Cultural Phenomenon

For Sale at Truck Stops Now

By RICK BROOKS and MARK MAREMONT
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

When a Krispy Kreme shop opened in Rochester, N.Y., in late 2000, more than 100 people lined up in a snowstorm before 5 a.m. to get one of the first hot, gooey doughnuts off the conveyer belt. Within about an hour, the drive-through lane was choked with 75 cars. Three TV stations and a radio station broadcast live from the scene. Anchors gobbled doughnuts on the air.

The excitement was genuine, but hardly spontaneous. Each local media outlet had gotten an early-morning delivery of 10 dozen free doughnuts from Krispy Kreme. Traffic reporters mentioned tie-ups near the store after a public-relations firm told them about it.

Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc. has used a blend of wily, low-cost marketing and finger-licking irresistibility to grow from a sleepy regional delicacy to a cultural phenomenon. It was dubbed the "hottest brand in America" by Fortune magazine last year as its stock hit nine times the 2000 initial-public-offering price.

But reality has begun to overtake the hype. Revenue growth slowed sharply in the past two quarters. Profit plunged 56% in the quarter ended Aug. 1, the company said last week. Sales at shops open at least 18 months, which used to post double-digit gains, will be flat to slightly down for the rest of the year, it also said last week.

The biggest problem for Krispy Kreme may be that the company grew too quickly and diluted its cult status by selling its doughnuts in too many outlets while trying to impress Wall Street. The number of Krispy Kreme shops has nearly tripled since early 2000, with 427 stores in 45 states and four foreign countries. Some 20,000 supermarkets, convenience stores, truck stops and other outside locations also sell the company's doughnuts.

"Where I get my gas tank filled, you can pick up individual Krispy Kreme doughnuts," says Gary Rhodes, a spokesman for Kroger Co. The Cincinnati company recently removed Krispy Kremes from self-serve display cases at 120 supermarkets in Ohio and North Carolina after sales declined. At those stores Kroger now sells its own brand, which it says are larger and cost customers 15 cents less. Kroger reports a "significant" rise in single-doughnut sales in Raleigh, N.C., since the switch.

Another issue is that Krispy Kreme has relied for a significant chunk of profits on high profit-margin equipment that it requires franchisees buy for each new store. Its profits have also been tied to growth in the number of franchised stores, because of the upfront fee each must pay. But there will be fewer store openings. Last week the company said it was cutting back sharply on the number of new stores.

Meanwhile, Krispy Kreme's cash on hand is down to $19.3 million, less than a third of what the company raised in its IPO in early 2000. The company is using some proceeds from a recent sale of unspecified assets to help fund operations, it confirms. Debt has climbed to $117.7 million from $4.6 million in early 2002.

Krispy Kreme's stock trades at barely over a quarter of the peak it reached just over a year ago, closing yesterday at $12.96 in 4 p.m. trading on the New York Stock Exchange. But earlier, insiders did a lot of selling. They realized nearly $400 million from sales of Krispy Kreme stock and "forward hedging contracts" in which they agree to transfer shares in the future.

Five weeks ago, the company said the Securities and Exchange Commission had begun an informal inquiry focused on a profit warning Krispy Kreme gave in May and on how the company accounts for repurchases of franchises. The SEC's precise interest isn't known, and the agency won't comment. Among possible issues: Krispy Kreme has spent $100.5 million to repurchase two franchises owned by corporate insiders. And it accounts for franchise repurchases in a way that largely avoids the need to deduct their value gradually from future earnings.

Krispy Kreme declined to comment for this article. But in the past, it has said its strategy is sound and so is its accounting. It has also said it is cooperating with the informal SEC inquiry.

Even at its slower pace of growth, Krispy Kreme expects to open 75 new stores in the fiscal year ending next Jan. 30. "We have faced tougher situations and come out stronger than before," said Scott Livengood, the chairman, CEO and president, last week when earnings were released. "I personally have never been more engaged and energized by Krispy Kreme's opportunities."

The 52-year-old Mr. Livengood is a true Krispy Kreme devotee. An employee for 27 years and CEO for six, he has said he chose a plate of Krispy Kremes instead of cake for his 16th-birthday party.

Though Krispy Kreme has blamed causes ranging from low-carb diets to high gas prices for its slump, Mr. Livengood conceded that the company has paid too little attention to day-to-day store management. Among his plans: a new sugar-free doughnut for carb counters, a chocolate glazed one for sugar fanatics, and smaller, more comfortable stores. The company may soon launch its first TV ads.

In Winston-Salem, N.C., where the company is based, Vernon Rudolph launched Krispy Kreme in 1937. Company lore says he used a secret recipe an uncle got from a French chef. Mr. Rudolph first sold doughnuts to grocers, but when locals asked to buy them directly, he cut a hole in his bakery wall, creating the first Krispy Kreme shop. There were fewer than 100 when he died in 1973.

Heirs sold the business to Beatrice Foods Co., which changed the recipe. About 20 franchisees, horrified, joined up to buy Krispy Kreme in 1982. The company took on new franchisees, and the first shop outside the Southeast opened in 1995 in Indianapolis.

Coming to Manhattan in 1996 gave Krispy Kreme cult status. Marketers positioned the doughnuts as a taste of nostalgia and promoted "doughnut theater." Customers watched as, behind glass, the equipment used a burst of air to extrude the dough, which was then cooked and doused in a waterfall of white glaze.

Soon lines were forming. Transplanted Southern humorist Roy Blount Jr. gushed in the New York Times that "when Krispy Kremes are hot, they are to other doughnuts what angels are to people." When Krispy Kreme went public in April 2000, its stock soared 76% on the first day, and more than quadrupled in the first five months.

But less than a year after the IPO, a Krispy Kreme executive, director and about 40 franchisees, their relatives and others with ties to the company sold more than $150 million worth of stock in a follow-on stock offering. In all, Krispy Kreme insiders have sold $267 million in stock since the IPO, and reaped $125 million more from hedging transactions in which they received cash immediately in return for pledging to transfer shares at predetermined times in the future.

Mr. Livengood, the CEO, has disposed of about 853,000 shares for $32 million, according to Thomson Financial. He still had 1.4 million (including 1.3 million in the form of options) as of late March. Mr. Livengood sold 235,500 shares in August 2003, a week after the all-time high, despite having said nine months earlier he wouldn't sell more stock "for at least a year." He said the sale was "totally consistent" with the "spirit" of his pledge.

Like many chains, this one owes much of its fast growth to franchising. Few Krispy Kreme investors understand that this model means that the company front-loads profits, says Donn Vickrey, an accountant and co-founder of Camelback Research Alliance in Scottsdale, Ariz. That's because to set up each store, a franchisee has to pay a franchise fee and also buy high-margin equipment from Krispy Kreme.

Unlike many chains, Krispy Kreme began buying back some of its franchises. Executives have said that the parent company is better equipped than franchisees to operate stores as markets mature, and that it buys only when the price is right. In two cases, though, the sellers were people close to the company.

In a deal 15 months ago, Krispy Kreme paid $67.5 million for franchise rights for Dallas and Shreveport, La., from Joseph A. McAleer Jr., a former Krispy Kreme chief executive and director, and Steven D. Smith, an emeritus director.

The price raised eyebrows because the franchisee had just five stores and one "commissary," or wholesale facility. A Krispy Kreme outlet typically costs about $2 million to build. The company had to take on debt to cover the cost. Krispy Kreme executives have said the price was reasonable as a multiple of cash flow, and also because of the huge untapped potential in Dallas in particular. They also say the price matched what an outside bidder would pay.

Each time Krispy Kreme reacquired a franchise, it assured investors the deal would immediately add to income. One reason was the accounting. Krispy Kreme typically assigned more than 85% of the purchase price to an intangible asset category called "reacquired franchise rights." This was a category it didn't have to amortize -- write off over time. That meant Krispy Kreme was acquiring profit-producing stores while not fully reflecting the costs on its books, giving an automatic boost to earnings. If it had amortized the full cost, this would come off its bottom line.

Mr. Vickrey, the accounting analyst, says his firm surveyed 18 other franchise operators. Of the four that recorded reacquired franchise rights, all amortized those costs over time. Krispy Kreme's method, Mr. Vickrey says, "is definitely not conservative" and is stretching accounting rules "to the limit and maybe beyond."

Last October, Krispy Kreme repurchased its Michigan franchisee, called Dough-Re-Mi Ltd., for $32.1 million. Part of the price went to pay past-due interest Dough-Re-Mi owed to Krispy Kreme. Krispy Kreme booked this sum as immediate profit. Some outside experts have said the company appeared to be taking money from one pocket, putting it into another and calling it income. Krispy Kreme officials have steadfastly defended their accounting and handling of franchise buybacks.

By the time of the Dough-Re-Mi buyback, Krispy Kreme shares had peaked and there were early signs that the fad was cooling, or reaching saturation in some markets. Sales at stores open at least 18 months, called "same store" sales, continued to post double-digit yearly rises. But overall average sales per store were falling. Mathematically, that could happen only if newer stores were performing poorly.

The New York franchise, which is partly company-owned, has lost money in the last three fiscal years. The biggest franchise, in Southern California, last year had a sharp fall in same-store sales. It put itself up for sale last year but remains unsold.

But at a 12-store franchise mostly in the Northwest, called KremeWorks LLC, sales have exceeded expectations and the stores are very profitable, says franchise CEO Gerard Centioli, who says he supports Krispy Kreme management. Still, the franchise told its investors in April they weren't likely to begin receiving projected returns on their investments because store-opening costs had soared. It had designed a high-cost store format with terrazzo floors, but it's now developing a less costly one, Mr. Centioli says.

Some of Krispy Kreme's profit growth in the last couple of years has come from bigger margins on sales to its franchisees. The company imposed a price increase for dough mix early last year, which it said was for raw-material costs. Some franchisees said they felt squeezed to help the parent's bottom line. Operating margins on Krispy Kreme's sales of dough and equipment to franchises grew to 23.9% in the first fiscal quarter, the company said, compared with 17.4% a year earlier.

Krispy Kreme also boosted revenue by introducing new equipment that it classified as "standard" -- meaning franchisees had to buy it for all new stores. A computerized extruder meant to cut the amount of dough used cost franchisees $70,000 for each store. "You'd look at it and say: 'How in the world could it cost $70,000?' " said one franchisee. Several franchisees said the required package of equipment to open a full-sized new Krispy Kreme store had crept up to $770,000 by last year from $500,000 in the late 1990s, though they said the machinery was also larger and more durable.

Write to Rick Brooks at rick.brooks@wsj.com and Mark Maremont at mark.maremont@wsj.com

Copyright © 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



To: Cisco who wrote (900)9/13/2004 9:39:30 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 1001
 
Barrons piece trashing KKD some more.

By the way ... regarding this guy (mentioned near the end of the article) :

"hedge-fund manager David Rocker, of Rocker Partners, which is short the [KKD] shares" --

I have vaguely followed him over the years (because he is on CNBC occasionally; and has also been written up in things like Barrons or the New York Times) ...

I think (if I remember correctly) he has (from time to time) been spectacularly WRONG on several stocks he has heavily sold short.

I am not sure that this is necessarily an indictment of him.

Lots of short-selling hedge funds get things wrong in a big way on certain bets, but still eke out okay returns.

Jon.

***********************************************************

Monday, September 13, 2004

Follow Up

Full of Holes

Krispy Kreme may get cheaper

FOR KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, the center didn't hold. Plagued by decelerating sales growth and slumping profit margins, the company that once made calories a status symbol has seen its shares sink to 11.50 from nearly 50 a year ago. Nor is the selloff apt to be over, given Krispy's cloudy outlook and a pending regulatory probe.

Krispy Kreme has two problems: its products and finances. Both stem from efforts to feed Wall Street's appetite for fast-growing profits. Since selling stock to the public in April 2000, the Winston-Salem, N.C., outfit has expanded to more than 400 owned and franchised stores, which turn out 7.5 million doughnuts a day. Familiarity has bred indigestion, however, and robbed the product of cachet, as Barron's suggested early on would be the case ("Dollars to Doughnuts," July 10, 2000.)

For a while -- a long while -- our concerns about the stock's valuation seemed half-baked. Shares sold for nearly 80 times earnings as recently as last year. In late August, however, Krispy reported its second consecutive wan quarter. Operating income slid 54%, to $6.2 million, or 10 cents a fully diluted share, on weak growth in sales. Management cut its new-store target for the second time this year, doubly troubling as sales of doughnut-making equipment to new units had become an important source of income.

Krispy also declined to provide earnings guidance for its fiscal year ending Feb. 1, "never a good sign," as John S. Glass, a CIBC World Markets analyst, noted in a recent report. He thinks the company will earn 61 cents in fiscal '05, and 81 cents in fiscal '06, versus 91 cents last year. He rates the stock Sector Underperform.

"The idea that Krispy Kreme has hit bottom is a nonstarter, given it's just beginning to cut back store openings, which provide two important sources of income," says hedge-fund manager David Rocker, of Rocker Partners, which is short the shares. "In addition, the balance sheet has been deteriorating, and it appears a sale and leaseback in the latest quarter provided most, if not all, of the cash on the balance sheet."

Glass has a 12-to-18-month price target of 10. The company's tangible book value is about $7 a share. So, at 8 to 8.50 -- about 10 to 11 times '06 estimates -- Krispy might be worth a nibble.

-- Lauren R. Rublin

E-mail comments to editors@barrons.com

Copyright © 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



To: Cisco who wrote (900)9/13/2004 9:44:42 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 1001
 
WSJ -- Krispy Kreme Auditor Delays Review.

September 13, 2004

Krispy Kreme Auditor Delays Review

By RICK BROOKS and MARK MAREMONT
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc. said its auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, refused to complete a review of the company's financial statements for the latest quarter until an outside law firm hired by the company's board is finished performing "certain additional procedures" requested by the auditors.

The Winston-Salem, N.C., doughnut chain didn't specify what the auditors' concerns were, but indicated in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing Friday that they relate to an unspecified acquisition during the fiscal year that ended Feb. 1.

The disclosure could spark new questions about the company's accounting transparency and a string of acquisitions that included the repurchase of several franchises, including two owned by Krispy Kreme insiders. The company, which recently reported a sharp falloff in growth and declining earnings, already faces an informal SEC inquiry focused on its franchise repurchases and a profit warning it gave in May.

In a statement included in its regular quarterly filing, Krispy Kreme said the audit committee of its board of directors hired the outside law firm on Aug. 30 to "perform an investigation regarding a specific matter relating to an acquisition in fiscal 2004." The acquisition wasn't identified, but the company said in the filing that the dollar amount involved in the probe was "immaterial from a quantitative standpoint."

The law firm, which also wasn't identified, concluded its probe in less than two weeks, finding that neither the company nor any of its employees engaged in any "intentional misconduct" related to the matter, according to Krispy Kreme. The company said it and its audit committee didn't believe any additional work was needed, but the committee nevertheless agreed to the extra work.

A Krispy Kreme spokeswoman said yesterday that she didn't know which acquisition was scrutinized by the outside law firm, but added that the company is "hopeful" that the additional work asked for by PricewaterhouseCoopers will be completed soon. A PricewaterhouseCoopers spokesman declined to comment.

The Wall Street Journal published an article on May 25 focused on Krispy Kreme's repurchase last October of the assets of its Michigan franchisee, Dough-Re-Mi Ltd. , for $32.1 million. Part of the price went to pay past-due interest Dough-Re-Mi owed to Krispy Kreme, which the doughnut chain then booked as immediate profit. Some accounting experts have said that was equivalent to Krispy Kreme taking money from one pocket, putting it into another and calling it profit.

Company officials have defended their accounting methods and handling of franchise buybacks. In its filing Friday, Krispy Kreme said it is "fully cooperating" with the SEC in its inquiry.

The company also has faced criticism of its April 2003 purchase of Montana Mills Bread Co., an unprofitable bakery chain, for $37.8 million in stock, because its then-chief operating officer, John W. Tate, was on the board of Montana Mills. Mr. Tate has said he stayed out of any talks tied to the takeover by Krispy Kreme. The company said in May that it would close the majority of the bakery stores and sell off the remaining outlets, resulting in a write-off of $35 million to $40 million. Mr. Tate resigned from Krispy Kreme last month to take a similar post at Restoration Hardware Inc.

In its filing, Krispy Kreme also gave details of a sale-leaseback deal completed in its most recent quarter, saying it had sold six stores for $17.3 million and agreed to lease them back for 20 years. The company had previously confirmed that some proceeds of the deal were used to fund continuing operations, but it had declined to provide the dollar amount of the arrangement. Some accounting experts said the sale-leaseback might be an indication of a cash crunch. Yesterday, the Krispy Kreme spokeswoman said the decision to sell was made by partners of a joint venture owned mostly by the company and that Krispy Kreme executives had no role in the decision. Friday's filing indicates that the transaction generated about $6.8 million in cash, with the rest of the proceeds used to reduce debt. Krispy Kreme had $19.3 million in cash as of Aug. 1, less than a third of what it raised in its 2000 initial public offering.

Write to Rick Brooks at rick.brooks@wsj.com and Mark Maremont at mark.maremont@wsj.com

Copyright © 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.