Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (7787)	8/17/2004 10:23:37 AM
From: sea_urchin	Respond to of 20039

> I say they used planes Here's one they didn't actually "use" -- Flight 93. But, all the same, it is regarded as being a victim of a hijack attempt on 9-11. mirror.co.uk >>UA93: THE EVIDENCE THE WITNESSES At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain saw a small military type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The FBI denies its existence THE DEBRIS The US Government insists the plane exploded on impact yet a one-ton section of the engine was found over a mile away and other light debris was found scattered over eight miles away* THE MOBILE CALL Passenger Edward Felt made an emergency call from the plane. He spoke of an explosion and seeing some white smoke. The superviser who took the call has been gagged by the FBI THE F-16s UA93 was identified as a hijack at 9.16am. At 9.35am three F-16s were ordered to "protect the White House at all costs" when it turned towards the capital. At 10.06am it crashed at Shanksville, less than 10mins flying time from Washington THE BLACK BOXES Sources claim the last thing heard on the cockpit voice recorder is the sound of wind - suggesting the plane had been holed THE SONIC BOOM The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville.<< * This is to me the clincher that the plane was shot down.

To: sea_urchin who wrote (7787)	8/18/2004 3:34:04 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Re: But what I cannot understand is why you are so insistent that only bombs were used and no aircraft when, after all, you are only theorizing. You do not know that as a fact. I disagree: my "theorizing" relies on the dozens of footages and pictures of the alleged crashes --and those are FACTS, aren't they? However, the footages/pics of the WTC "crashes" are doctored/forged/manipulated facts! As every expert engineer noticed, it doesn't make sense for a Boeing airliner to just melt into the WTC at 500 mph like a bullet into a jelly blob.... If you were right and airplanes were really used as missiles against the WTC THEN we wouldn't be struggling with fake/forged videos and pictures! Footages of the crashes themselves would show REAL crashes, not the footage of a Boeing airliner SUPERIMPOSED on the footage of the explosion within the tower... Furthermore, videos and pictures of the exit blasts would have been available for everybody to watch FROM DAY ONE. Actually, we would be analyzing videos, footages, and pictures of the crash(es) shot from every possible angle --from the Empire State bldg clockwise to Brooklyn, to the Statue of Liberty(), to the New Jersey shores... So, all in all, the video discrepancies --that is, the poor quality of the forgery/doctoring carried out by US intelligence-- make up the best evidence that no planes were involved. Another strong argument in favor of my "no planes" theory is that, from its very inception, the terrorist plot against the WTC called for the total destruction of the WTC towers, that is, the planting of mininukes in the towers' basements. Why? Because, unlike the Pentagon, the WTC towers were civilian facilities where thousands of US --and foreign-- citizens were working. I mean that, even if dummy Boeings were remotely piloted to crash into the towers, 911 conspirators could not have stopped at that! Hundreds of lawyers, insurance experts, and private investigators hired by the (wealthy) families' victims would have swarmed the area, carrying out their own forensics.... only to find out that nobody was aboard the planes!?! Gus () As regards the Statue of Liberty islet, I must admit that I was wrong to surmise that tourists visiting the islet could have witnessed the bombing of WTC... for the simple reason that the Statue of Liberty venue wasn't open yet! It's open from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm... See? I can correct my "dogmas" myself! usatourist.com