Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (605111)	8/17/2004 8:56:44 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 769670

Clinton was against the war. That doesn't make him a coward. Gandhi was against war too, but he was also one of the most courageous men of the last century. Cheney and Dumbya were FOR the war and avoided going to the war. That is why they are cowards; not just cowards, but filthy disgusting cowards.

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (605111)	8/17/2004 8:57:49 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Yes. Bill Clinton was a coward for avoiding service in Vietnam. Just like Bush, Cheney, Rove, and Rush. They're all cowards. Now, where does your argument lead? The issue is not cowardness, but qualification. Kerry is more qualified because of his experience in Vietnam than Bush. He acquired a sense of what war is really like, and thus learned the truism that war is the last resort, not a tactic.

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (605111)	8/17/2004 9:03:31 PM
From: Wayners	Respond to of 769670

I'll say this for Clinton, by avoiding Vietnam isn't guilty the war crimes and attrocies that Kerry in his own words said he committed in public testimony and in his book tour of duty. Kerry is either a liar or a War Criminal. Neither one is fit to be President.