Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Hurst who wrote (43716)	8/18/2004 1:36:32 PM
From: techguerrilla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Bushies focus on "pertinent stuff" ..... .......... like almost 1000 dead Americans in a worthless Middle Eastern desert and spending almost $200 billion to do that. Frankly, I'm amazed Bush even has the audacity to run for reelection. /john

To: Don Hurst who wrote (43716)	8/18/2004 1:54:25 PM
From: Glenn Petersen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

The material is only pertinent if there is a Kerry presidency. I doubt that there would be anything in the probate papers that would be harmful to John Kerry. Perhaps harmful to John Heinz, a Republican Senator who apparently had enough clout even after he was dead to get his probate papers sealed one day after his death. If Kerry is elected president, the perceived lack of transparency in Ms. Kerry's affairs is going to be an ongoing source of speculation. Particularly since she has said that she intends to carry on her work as she has in the past regardless of the outcome of the election. The smart thing for her to do would be to open up the probate records and release her tax returns. If she does not do that prior to the election, my guess is that she will do so if her husband is elected. One week of media frenzy versus four years of siege? An easy decision.