Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (61475)	8/18/2004 8:34:29 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 794376

<font color=blue>"The after-action reports have the details of the enemy fire, casualties and battle damage."<font color=black> After action reports did not obviate the requirement that a separate report must be filed for each incident when they received enemy fire & an equally separate casualty report was required to be filed for each instance when there was a casualty. These reports were required in addition to the after action reports. Since they were not filed in each instance cited by the Swift Boat Vets, they stand as additional evidence that Kerry's lone version of events stand at odds with all other available evidence, including Kerry's own conflicting accounts. <font color=blue>"Read the after-action reports for yourself. I don't think that they were faked. If you see anything in them that suggests they were fabricated please let me know."<font color=black> I'm not questioning Kerry's ability to self aggrandize with alternate versions of reality & to do so in writing. That has now been clearly established time & time again throught his life. The point is that the mysteriously missing casualty reports & enemy fire reports along with the documentation & sworn testimony of numerous eye witnesses to these events all stand in stark contrast to Kerry's version of reality, again not an unusual faux pas for Kerry as history clearly shows.