Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (198046)	8/19/2004 9:01:09 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574565

Sure it would. The cases of mixed marriages in the days of segregation were tried many times. Things are different now. Even though gay marriage would be a more radical departure from tradition and traditional law, it would be more likely to be accepeted. And when Utah allowed polygamous marriages Utah wasn't allowed to become state with legal polygamous marriages. Utah is a better example of the Feds imposing on a state then some states not recognizing marriages that where legal in other states. xmission.com historytogo.utah.gov