Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62411)	8/21/2004 11:45:41 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793897

If he wasn't AWOL, there should have been some reason given. If he was AWOL, there should have been disciplinary action. A flyboy for a plane they didn't have for him to fly? In his last year of making meetings? In those days, they didn't care what he did. Now if you could come up with a group of "Guard vets" who wanted to run ads about what a lousy officer he was, you might have something. Otherwise, "forgeddaboutit."

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (62411)	8/21/2004 2:50:05 PM
From: haqihana	Respond to of 793897

KT, You said that Bush had not made his records public. Now you are trying to say that he did not explain an absence while in the guard. Can't you make up your mind. You are talking like "flip-flop" Kerry. BTW, That is not a compliment. Bush's records are, now, public knowledge. There is no reason to flash them all over his website. The only reason Kerry is doing it, is because he had, absolutely, nothing else to run on. That is why he is trying to avoid publication of his voting record in the Senate. His votes contradict every promise he is now making to the American people. Just like, he voted for the war in Iraq, before he voted against it. That indicates a very unstable person, regardless of what he is running for, or running from.