SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (44622)8/23/2004 1:44:41 PM
From: SkywatcherRespond to of 81568
 
Editors Note: An excerpt from William Rivers Pitt's story yesterday on the Not So Swift
Boat Veterans:

* Adding to the weight of evidence that the Swift Boat Vets were working fist-in-glove with
the Bush campaign, an enterprising blogger named digby revealed that a member of the
Swift Boat Vets steering committee, Ken Cordier, was listed on the Bush campaign
website as a member of the campaign team until August 19th. His name has since
been removed, but as digby points out, you can still see it there if you visit the cached
version of the site.

We have to ask: If Cordier's name wasn't discovered on the web site, would he still be
employed by the Bush campaign? Since his role in the campaign was veterans outreach,
was the formation of the Swift Boat Vets part of his campaign duties?

Go to Original

Bush Supporter Leaves Campaign Over Role in Ad
By Reuters

Saturday 21 August 2004

CRAWFORD, Texas (Reuters) - A Vietnam veteran who worked with President Bush's campaign
has left over his appearance in a commercial by a group challenging Democratic candidate John
Kerry's war record, a campaign spokesman said on Saturday.

Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt said Ken Cordier was a Bush supporter during the 2000
election and served as a member of his steering committee to help reach out to veterans during this
election.

``Col. Cordier did not inform the campaign of his involvement in the advertisement being run by (Swift
Boat Veterans for Truth),'' Schmidt said. ``Because of his involvement with this 527 (group), Col.
Cordier will no longer participate'' in the steering committee.

The disclosure of Cordier's involvement came one day after White House spokesman Scott
McClellan and Bush campaign chairman Marc Racicot denied the campaign coordinated with the
group on the ads, which claim that Kerry lied about his Vietnam War service.

Kerry has called the ads inaccurate and accused the group of being a front for the Bush campaign.
On Friday the Kerry campaign filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission seeking to force
the ads' withdrawal.

New advertisements by the group are set to debut next week in states where Kerry has touted his
military service. Kerry won several medals and his record is often contrasted with Bush's service in the
Texas Air National Guard during the war.

McClellan has refused to specifically condemn the ads and instead has urged Kerry to join Bush in
calling for an end to all commercials funded by unrestricted donations.

U.S. advocacy groups can collect vast sums of money to run their own political advertisements but
are barred from coordinating their activities with campaigns or political parties.

``There seems to be an increasing amount of evidence that the Bush campaign is behind this,''
Kerry campaign spokesman Phil Singer said. ``So it's no surprise that the president refuses to
condemn these scurrilous ads.''

The Bush campaign has said Kerry ignores the fact that his backers run attack advertising aimed at
the president.

Over the last 12 months, groups favoring the Democrats have spent $63.5 million on ads attacking
Bush, according to the Bush campaign, which filed its own FEC complaint earlier this year alleging
coordination between Kerry and the left-leaning groups.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (44622)8/23/2004 2:19:32 PM
From: mistermjRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 81568
 
Either all the SwiftVets are liars or Kerry is. Lets find out by looking at the medical records.

Why prevent the voting electorate from making their own decision on this?