SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (198117)8/24/2004 2:45:00 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1577194
 
<font color=brown>A Bush flip flop? I think so! <font color=black>

*******************************************************

Palestinians Chide U.S. Over Settlements

Palestinians Denounce Apparent U.S. Readiness to Allow Construction Inside West Bank Settlements

The Associated Press



JERUSALEM Aug. 22, 2004 — Palestinian leaders reacted angrily on Sunday to Washington's apparent readiness to allow construction inside Israeli settlements in the West Bank, warning that it would destroy the peace process.
U.S. officials in Israel confirmed to The Associated Press that though there has been no formal decision, the American government is not objecting to construction in the main settlement blocs, as long as the settlements themselves are not expanded while an internal administration debate over the issue continues.




Such a shift would run counter to the U.S.-backed "road map" peace plan, presented by President Bush in June 2003. The plan's initial stage mandates a complete freeze in construction in the settlements.


Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia refused to accept the possibility that U.S. policy has changed.

"I can't believe that America is now saying that settlement expansion is all right," he said. "This will destroy the peace process."

Nabil Abu Rdeneh, a top aide to Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, called on the White House to "clarify" its position, fearing it would "encourage the Israeli government to continue and escalate its war against the Palestinian people."

The U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said an American team will visit Israel next month to discuss where construction would be permitted.

In Washington, administration officials insisted they are not signaling any major change in policy.

"We continue to work with the Israelis on progress toward the settlement freeze," Jim Wilkinson, deputy national security adviser, said Sunday.

In a related development, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's office announced Sunday that the administration providing compensation to settlers who leave Gaza and four West Bank settlements is officially in operation.

According to Sharon's "unilateral disengagement" plan, Israel is to evacuate all 21 Gaza settlements and four in the West Bank by late next year. However, the plan has triggered widespread opposition in Sharon's own party.

Continued..........

abcnews.go.com



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (198117)8/24/2004 2:52:23 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1577194
 
<font color=brown> I guess the Bushies have the same feeling about what will happen in NYC as I. Its too bad.......Bush will miss most of 'the rock and roll' festivities in the Big Apple!<font color=black>

**********************************************************

Stopping by New York: why Bush won't linger


Elisabeth Bumiller NYT Monday, August 23, 2004
White House Letter

CRAWFORD, Texas More than a year ago, when Karl Rove and President George W. Bush began planning the Republican National Convention, they picked New York City in early September so that the event would flow into the third anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks.
.
Some Republicans said then that Bush might even visit ground zero, despite the risk of appearing to make political use of the tragedy. Most others said the convention's timing would remind voters of what the campaign considers Bush's finest hour - the moment he grabbed the bullhorn in the rubble at the tip of Manhattan and shouted that the people who had knocked down the buildings would hear from him soon.
.
But now it turns out that Bush may not spend a single night in the city that helped transform his presidency. At this point, the unofficial plan is for him to arrive in New York sometime on Sept. 2, the final day of the four-day convention, deliver his acceptance speech that night, then leave immediately for a midnight rally in Pennsylvania.
.
Campaign officials say the schedule could still change, and that Bush may have a brief New York sleepover in the end.
.
But either way, the incumbent president has no plans to visit ground zero, or hang around in his room for days at the Waldorf Astoria watching the party on television.
.
So if it is not the shortest time that a presidential nominee has spent at a nominating convention - President Franklin D. Roosevelt did not even go to the Democratic National Convention in 1944, during World War II - it is close. Senator John Kerry spent two days at his party's convention in Boston last month; Bush's father spent four days at the 1992 Republican convention in Houston.
.
Republicans acknowledge that one reason for the president's quick drop-by is their concern that Bush not be seen as taking advantage of the deaths of 3,000 people. What seemed like a good idea a year and a half ago, before Bush put on a flight suit and declared major combat operations in Iraq at an end, does not seem like such a good idea in the highly charged political environment now.
.
"They are being very sensitive not to exploit 9/11," said one Republican close to the campaign.
.
That doesn't mean that Bush and other convention speakers won't mention it, and often, from the podium.
.
"You can't not have it," said Matthew Dowd, a senior political adviser to Bush. "It would be like Roosevelt not talking about Pearl Harbor."
.
But as Ken Mehlman, Bush's campaign manager, put it: "You talk about it as an important event that the country shared, and you talk about it in an appropriate and tasteful way." Republicans said there are also tactical and logistical reasons for Bush's speedy convention trip. The last time anyone checked, New York was not a swing state, and polls show Kerry trouncing Bush there by double-digits. The president's advisers point out the obvious, which is that it is politically foolish to waste time in New York.
.
The advisers noted that Bush is also likely to alienate the city by lingering and tying up traffic, blocking streets and further inciting what could be the biggest street demonstrations at a political convention since the Democrats gathered in Chicago in 1968.
.
A quick exit would underscore the tone of Bush's campaign, the advisers said, which is that he is running hard in a tied race for his political life. They insisted that his getaway was not an insult to New York, a city Bush never liked before Sept. 11, 2001, but that he warmed to when he met with firefighters and other rescue workers after the attacks.
.
"It's not a statement that he dislikes New York City," the Republican close to the campaign said. "It's a statement that he's going to work."
.
The last time anyone checked, Pennsylvania was indeed a swing state.
.
Overall, Bush's advisers say they remain happy with the choice of New York, which has underwritten many of the costs of the convention. To Rove, the gathering was also an opportunity to journey into the citadel of the Democrats and make an in-your-face statement about the strength of the president and his party.
.
"Karl wanted to go into the heart of the opposition's territory and show that Bush could have a successful convention in New York," the Republican close to the campaign said.
.
In the meantime, Bush is working on his acceptance speech at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, but he plans to start campaigning Thursday for the week leading into New York.
.
As for Roosevelt, he delivered his acceptance speech in 1944 by radio from a private railroad car in San Diego, and said that the war left him no time to campaign.
.
But only up to a point. "I shall, however, feel free to report to the people the facts about matters of concern to them, and especially to correct any misrepresentation," Roosevelt said.
.
Elisabeth Bumiller can be reached at pagetwo@iht.com.
.
Tomorrow: John F. Burns writes about power brokers in Iraq.

See more of the world that matters - click here for home delivery of the International Herald Tribune.
< < Back to Start of Article White House Letter

CRAWFORD, Texas More than a year ago, when Karl Rove and President George W. Bush began planning the Republican National Convention, they picked New York City in early September so that the event would flow into the third anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks.
.
Some Republicans said then that Bush might even visit ground zero, despite the risk of appearing to make political use of the tragedy. Most others said the convention's timing would remind voters of what the campaign considers Bush's finest hour - the moment he grabbed the bullhorn in the rubble at the tip of Manhattan and shouted that the people who had knocked down the buildings would hear from him soon.
.
But now it turns out that Bush may not spend a single night in the city that helped transform his presidency. At this point, the unofficial plan is for him to arrive in New York sometime on Sept. 2, the final day of the four-day convention, deliver his acceptance speech that night, then leave immediately for a midnight rally in Pennsylvania.
.
Campaign officials say the schedule could still change, and that Bush may have a brief New York sleepover in the end.
.
But either way, the incumbent president has no plans to visit ground zero, or hang around in his room for days at the Waldorf Astoria watching the party on television.
.
So if it is not the shortest time that a presidential nominee has spent at a nominating convention - President Franklin D. Roosevelt did not even go to the Democratic National Convention in 1944, during World War II - it is close. Senator John Kerry spent two days at his party's convention in Boston last month; Bush's father spent four days at the 1992 Republican convention in Houston.
.
Republicans acknowledge that one reason for the president's quick drop-by is their concern that Bush not be seen as taking advantage of the deaths of 3,000 people. What seemed like a good idea a year and a half ago, before Bush put on a flight suit and declared major combat operations in Iraq at an end, does not seem like such a good idea in the highly charged political environment now.
.
"They are being very sensitive not to exploit 9/11," said one Republican close to the campaign.
.
That doesn't mean that Bush and other convention speakers won't mention it, and often, from the podium.
.
"You can't not have it," said Matthew Dowd, a senior political adviser to Bush. "It would be like Roosevelt not talking about Pearl Harbor."
.
But as Ken Mehlman, Bush's campaign manager, put it: "You talk about it as an important event that the country shared, and you talk about it in an appropriate and tasteful way." Republicans said there are also tactical and logistical reasons for Bush's speedy convention trip. The last time anyone checked, New York was not a swing state, and polls show Kerry trouncing Bush there by double-digits. The president's advisers point out the obvious, which is that it is politically foolish to waste time in New York.
.
The advisers noted that Bush is also likely to alienate the city by lingering and tying up traffic, blocking streets and further inciting what could be the biggest street demonstrations at a political convention since the Democrats gathered in Chicago in 1968.
.
A quick exit would underscore the tone of Bush's campaign, the advisers said, which is that he is running hard in a tied race for his political life. They insisted that his getaway was not an insult to New York, a city Bush never liked before Sept. 11, 2001, but that he warmed to when he met with firefighters and other rescue workers after the attacks.
.
"It's not a statement that he dislikes New York City," the Republican close to the campaign said. "It's a statement that he's going to work."
.
The last time anyone checked, Pennsylvania was indeed a swing state.
.
Overall, Bush's advisers say they remain happy with the choice of New York, which has underwritten many of the costs of the convention. To Rove, the gathering was also an opportunity to journey into the citadel of the Democrats and make an in-your-face statement about the strength of the president and his party.
.
"Karl wanted to go into the heart of the opposition's territory and show that Bush could have a successful convention in New York," the Republican close to the campaign said.
.
In the meantime, Bush is working on his acceptance speech at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, but he plans to start campaigning Thursday for the week leading into New York.
.
As for Roosevelt, he delivered his acceptance speech in 1944 by radio from a private railroad car in San Diego, and said that the war left him no time to campaign.
.
But only up to a point. "I shall, however, feel free to report to the people the facts about matters of concern to them, and especially to correct any misrepresentation," Roosevelt said.
.
Elisabeth Bumiller can be reached at pagetwo@iht.com.
.
Tomorrow: John F. Burns writes about power brokers in Iraq. White House Letter

CRAWFORD, Texas More than a year ago, when Karl Rove and President George W. Bush began planning the Republican National Convention, they picked New York City in early September so that the event would flow into the third anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks.
.
Some Republicans said then that Bush might even visit ground zero, despite the risk of appearing to make political use of the tragedy. Most others said the convention's timing would remind voters of what the campaign considers Bush's finest hour - the moment he grabbed the bullhorn in the rubble at the tip of Manhattan and shouted that the people who had knocked down the buildings would hear from him soon.
.
But now it turns out that Bush may not spend a single night in the city that helped transform his presidency. At this point, the unofficial plan is for him to arrive in New York sometime on Sept. 2, the final day of the four-day convention, deliver his acceptance speech that night, then leave immediately for a midnight rally in Pennsylvania.
.
Campaign officials say the schedule could still change, and that Bush may have a brief New York sleepover in the end.
.
But either way, the incumbent president has no plans to visit ground zero, or hang around in his room for days at the Waldorf Astoria watching the party on television.
.
So if it is not the shortest time that a presidential nominee has spent at a nominating convention - President Franklin D. Roosevelt did not even go to the Democratic National Convention in 1944, during World War II - it is close. Senator John Kerry spent two days at his party's convention in Boston last month; Bush's father spent four days at the 1992 Republican convention in Houston.
.
Republicans acknowledge that one reason for the president's quick drop-by is their concern that Bush not be seen as taking advantage of the deaths of 3,000 people. What seemed like a good idea a year and a half ago, before Bush put on a flight suit and declared major combat operations in Iraq at an end, does not seem like such a good idea in the highly charged political environment now.
.
"They are being very sensitive not to exploit 9/11," said one Republican close to the campaign.
.
That doesn't mean that Bush and other convention speakers won't mention it, and often, from the podium.
.
"You can't not have it," said Matthew Dowd, a senior political adviser to Bush. "It would be like Roosevelt not talking about Pearl Harbor."
.
But as Ken Mehlman, Bush's campaign manager, put it: "You talk about it as an important event that the country shared, and you talk about it in an appropriate and tasteful way." Republicans said there are also tactical and logistical reasons for Bush's speedy convention trip. The last time anyone checked, New York was not a swing state, and polls show Kerry trouncing Bush there by double-digits. The president's advisers point out the obvious, which is that it is politically foolish to waste time in New York.
.
The advisers noted that Bush is also likely to alienate the city by lingering and tying up traffic, blocking streets and further inciting what could be the biggest street demonstrations at a political convention since the Democrats gathered in Chicago in 1968.
.
A quick exit would underscore the tone of Bush's campaign, the advisers said, which is that he is running hard in a tied race for his political life. They insisted that his getaway was not an insult to New York, a city Bush never liked before Sept. 11, 2001, but that he warmed to when he met with firefighters and other rescue workers after the attacks.
.
"It's not a statement that he dislikes New York City," the Republican close to the campaign said. "It's a statement that he's going to work."
.
The last time anyone checked, Pennsylvania was indeed a swing state.
.
Overall, Bush's advisers say they remain happy with the choice of New York, which has underwritten many of the costs of the convention. To Rove, the gathering was also an opportunity to journey into the citadel of the Democrats and make an in-your-face statement about the strength of the president and his party.
.
"Karl wanted to go into the heart of the opposition's territory and show that Bush could have a successful convention in New York," the Republican close to the campaign said.
.
In the meantime, Bush is working on his acceptance speech at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, but he plans to start campaigning Thursday for the week leading into New York.
.
As for Roosevelt, he delivered his acceptance speech in 1944 by radio from a private railroad car in San Diego, and said that the war left him no time to campaign.
.
But only up to a point. "I shall, however, feel free to report to the people the facts about matters of concern to them, and especially to correct any misrepresentation," Roosevelt said.
.
Elisabeth Bumiller can be reached at pagetwo@iht.com.
.
Tomorrow: John F. Burns writes about power brokers in Iraq. White House Letter

CRAWFORD, Texas More than a year ago, when Karl Rove and President George W. Bush began planning the Republican National Convention, they picked New York City in early September so that the event would flow into the third anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks.
.
Some Republicans said then that Bush might even visit ground zero, despite the risk of appearing to make political use of the tragedy. Most others said the convention's timing would remind voters of what the campaign considers Bush's finest hour - the moment he grabbed the bullhorn in the rubble at the tip of Manhattan and shouted that the people who had knocked down the buildings would hear from him soon.
.
But now it turns out that Bush may not spend a single night in the city that helped transform his presidency. At this point, the unofficial plan is for him to arrive in New York sometime on Sept. 2, the final day of the four-day convention, deliver his acceptance speech that night, then leave immediately for a midnight rally in Pennsylvania.
.
Campaign officials say the schedule could still change, and that Bush may have a brief New York sleepover in the end.
.
But either way, the incumbent president has no plans to visit ground zero, or hang around in his room for days at the Waldorf Astoria watching the party on television.
.
So if it is not the shortest time that a presidential nominee has spent at a nominating convention - President Franklin D. Roosevelt did not even go to the Democratic National Convention in 1944, during World War II - it is close. Senator John Kerry spent two days at his party's convention in Boston last month; Bush's father spent four days at the 1992 Republican convention in Houston.
.
Republicans acknowledge that one reason for the president's quick drop-by is their concern that Bush not be seen as taking advantage of the deaths of 3,000 people. What seemed like a good idea a year and a half ago, before Bush put on a flight suit and declared major combat operations in Iraq at an end, does not seem like such a good idea in the highly charged political environment now.
.
"They are being very sensitive not to exploit 9/11," said one Republican close to the campaign.
.
That doesn't mean that Bush and other convention speakers won't mention it, and often, from the podium.
.
"You can't not have it," said Matthew Dowd, a senior political adviser to Bush. "It would be like Roosevelt not talking about Pearl Harbor."
.
But as Ken Mehlman, Bush's campaign manager, put it: "You talk about it as an important event that the country shared, and you talk about it in an appropriate and tasteful way." Republicans said there are also tactical and logistical reasons for Bush's speedy convention trip. The last time anyone checked, New York was not a swing state, and polls show Kerry trouncing Bush there by double-digits. The president's advisers point out the obvious, which is that it is politically foolish to waste time in New York.
.
The advisers noted that Bush is also likely to alienate the city by lingering and tying up traffic, blocking streets and further inciting what could be the biggest street demonstrations at a political convention since the Democrats gathered in Chicago in 1968.
.
A quick exit would underscore the tone of Bush's campaign, the advisers said, which is that he is running hard in a tied race for his political life. They insisted that his getaway was not an insult to New York, a city Bush never liked before Sept. 11, 2001, but that he warmed to when he met with firefighters and other rescue workers after the attacks.
.
"It's not a statement that he dislikes New York City," the Republican close to the campaign said. "It's a statement that he's going to work."
.
The last time anyone checked, Pennsylvania was indeed a swing state.
.
Overall, Bush's advisers say they remain happy with the choice of New York, which has underwritten many of the costs of the convention. To Rove, the gathering was also an opportunity to journey into the citadel of the Democrats and make an in-your-face statement about the strength of the president and his party.
.
"Karl wanted to go into the heart of the opposition's territory and show that Bush could have a successful convention in New York," the Republican close to the campaign said.
.
In the meantime, Bush is working on his acceptance speech at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, but he plans to start campaigning Thursday for the week leading into New York.
.
As for Roosevelt, he delivered his acceptance speech in 1944 by radio from a private railroad car in San Diego, and said that the war left him no time to campaign.
.
Continued.............

iht.com