Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (198194)	8/24/2004 4:42:36 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1577886

This is convenient for the Left. Kerry can lie, mislead and obfuscate all he wants without being called a "liar", yet when Bush relies on the same information and comes to the same conclusions as innumerable Lefties, he is a "liar". In Oct., Bush gave a speech in Cincinnati.......he was going to talk about the yellow cake uranium, but C. Rice told him not to because the info was not correct. Four months later, he put that statement into his State of the Union.

To: i-node who wrote (198194)	8/24/2004 6:15:54 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577886

The fact that something is ultimately shown to be false does not, in any way, prove or even suggest a lie, absent some indication of an intent to mislead. You do have to add one and one. The information was known to be false by Bush because he used it in previous speeches and was told to remove it, and he did. That means he knew it was false. Then he said it again with the express purpose of starting a war. That is so much a lie that it practicly leaves me flabergasted that anyone would deny it. TP