Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (144004)	8/25/2004 12:21:11 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"I believe we should let Israel make that decision without any interference from us. If it is attacked by Iran, and responds by turning Tehran into a parking lot, so be it; let the chips fall where they may." Before we let this happen, we should consider all the consequences, both intended an uninttended. This is way too simplistic an analysis for me. But i dont have a clue as to how the world would look post this war and whether it will be even habitable if the nukes fly.

To: redfish who wrote (144004)	8/25/2004 1:00:38 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Do you feel that way in general? Do you think any country that wants nukes should have them and should be free to vaporize their neighbors if they feel threatened and/or attacked? Or is this the sole prerogative of Israel?