Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (144043)	8/25/2004 3:47:29 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

"You forgot the new Iraq. They would definitely be pro-Iran in such an event." Iraq shiaa would march with them. Sunnis support the Pals so they too would be onboard if they had a military that is. "However, they (egypt) have engaged Israel in war previously and seem more and more iching to go at it again, especially over the Palestinian issue. " I dont think mubarek goes down that road but of course if he doesnt he risks being overthrown. As a Jew, and an old one at that, i have studied the region over a long period of time. The nightmare has always been 100 million arabs united and on the march but given the arab world that has always been an impossibility--now add iran to the mix along with a coalition of willing arabs ready to grab the spoils when the persians march and i do worry. And thats why israel has nukes and i worry about that too. I would rather be a user of nukes than a victim but the carnage and residual affects of a nuke war make this not a world fit for our young. Mike