Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (64064)	8/25/2004 4:46:07 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793843

I know I have seen it reported in various papers that Bush signed a form 180, though I think it was after the controversy in Feb/March, and it took until a month or two ago for all the records to be found. The BBC put scare quotes around "found", I remember that. Here's some evidence for you - as various Dem spokesmen are calling for Bush's TANG service to be scrutinized (again), why aren't any of them calling for a full release of records, if there were any more to be had? I should think that settles the question that there are no more to be found.

To: Rambi who wrote (64064)	8/25/2004 4:49:27 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 793843

<<I keep hearing conflicting things about Bush and the 180. The Dems say he didn't. I tried to find it online and came across a couple of blogger references to his signing it, but nothing firsthand. Is there any proof that he signed it?>> I remember him signing it last Feb. and the releasing more records in June that were thought to have been burned. Like you, I have searched the net but have run into 2 problems. 1. In 1997 you could have run a Bush form 180 search and got 25 good articles, now you run the same and get 1,263,998 not worth a cow patty sites. 2. That was 6 months ago so the relevant articles have been archived. Yep, the papers want to charge you to search those archives.