SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (66074)8/26/2004 2:47:53 PM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
Kirk, even here your analysis has issues. Assuming the article posted on this thread is correct, Chambers last sale before Nov 2003 was Feb 1999.

Feb 1999 was about the same time (was either Q1-99 or Q1-98) as my last csco buy before the boom took csco to unbelievable heights. After it dropped, I started my buying again, but only after sitting on the sidelines for so long during the boom watching it go up then down. He would have been better off selling csco during its peak around Dec 2000, than Feb 1999 or Nov 2003.

He comes across as a contrarian indicator.

Regards,
Amy J



To: Kirk © who wrote (66074)8/26/2004 3:25:55 PM
From: rkral  Respond to of 77400
 
Kirk, RE "My point was Chambers slowly diversifying his position is not proof that Cisco is not another Enron since Ken Lay of Enron did the same thing and used the same reasons."

"Argumentum ad ignorantiam means "argument from ignorance". This fallacy occurs whenever it is argued that something must be true simply because it has not been proved false." virtualschool.edu

You're just saying it might be true, but there is little difference IMO.

Ron


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News