Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (144167)	8/26/2004 7:16:31 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You dishonor only yourself with this type of politically agendized character assassination. Oh please. Having had way too much experience with the "despise, not hate" Clinton guy who wears his political religion on his nametag, I find this "dishonor" business absurd. It'd be nice if they'd all go back to some political cesspool or other to join in the ever-building official W Kerry smearage campaign, but I'm not holding my breath.

To: one_less who wrote (144167)	8/27/2004 8:36:02 AM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Moi?, "...politically agendized character assassination." Just telling it as I see it. Here is some reasonable information. Did Bush II serve in the N.G:? Yes Did Bush II publicly protest in any way what so ever during or just after the Viet Nam war? No Did Bush II avoid going to Viet Nam as so many rich kids did? Yes Did he have "pull" to avoid problems with his lack of performance in the N.G.? Yes And the reasonable conclusion: Bush II is a chicken hawk. You still have not defined "mendacious logic". For your information mendacious means "given to or characterized by deception or falsehood" So mendacious logic means deceptive or false logic. You owe it to yourself to show where the logic is deceptive or false. Try taking the the 4 questions and their answers and the conclusion and demonstrate where in lies the falsity of the logic. Demonstrate that Bush II is NOT a chicken hawk.