Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (64691)	8/27/2004 4:45:24 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793840

"None of us knows what this is going to turn into. By everyone’s hope, it won’t be Chicago 1968." Press Think For TV news organizations, the concern is not how to cover all the possible protests around town. It's "inciting disruptive behavior by showing up with cameras." And it's losing control of the convention telecast to events outside. There are jittery people in the networks, trying not to be the cause of anything. A couple of reminders this week of just how politicized the territory has become around the major media. There's a rise in tensions as we get closer to the convention countdown in New York. On Tuesday (Aug. 24) TV Newser reported that the area around Fox News Headquarters in New York City had received concrete fortifications. Security concerns have led Rockefeller Center to position fixtures outside Fox News headquarters ahead of the GOP convention. "About 12 large round concrete fixtures doubling as oversized flower pots were positioned in front of the Fox News studios on 6th Avenue" recently, an e-mailer says. "These are obviously positioned to prevent any vehicles from the street to jump the sidewalk and get close to the building." Is Fox News one of the sites around New York City where a police task force might expect trouble, and order fortifications? Yes, because of what it stands for, and in alignment with. Media sites are political sites, especially in Fox's case, which means there's a potential for violence but also for political expression. That's what the oversized flower pots in front of Fox News are saying. Harden the perimeter. We may see "activity" around the building. Meanwhile the city is expecting there to be protest all over, but no one knows what to expect when it comes to big marches and other street demonstrations. So imagination is free to operate. The New York Observer's Joe Hagan reports this week that for TV news organizations, the main concern is not how to cover all the possible protests around town. It's "inciting disruptive behavior by showing up with cameras." The people who run network television don't want to be "causing" street politics in New York City. They are willing to take stealth action to avoid it. "The fear is that the presence of that causes it," said David Bohrman, the executive producer of CNN’s convention coverage. "That’s really a fear. We’re reluctant to pull our cameras out if there’s a crowd of people. You don’t want to galvanize a crowd by pointing a camera at them. You want to report on them, but you don’t want to be the cause of them." Mr. Bohrman said that was one of the reasons that most national news organizations didn’t mark their equipment with logos. "I think you’ll find the networks and the cable networks, their cars won’t be marked so they don’t attract attention..." Fortifications in front of Fox. Unmarked cars for network news crews. And a strange kind of dialogue going on between protestors in their rumored descent on the city and TV execs trying to war game it: could we possibly have a situation with the protestors next week, where "democracy is in the streets" again, and TV, confronted with news on two fronts, cross cuts from one to the other--from the convention, to the streets? Does that even happen at conventions any more? Do our rules permit it? Didn't we outgrow it? Hagen reports on the confusion sown by not wanting to be a cause: It wasn’t clear what would constitute a news event big enough to cut into a prime-time Republican speech—especially President Bush’s. And nobody was willing to hazard a guess, for fear of inadvertently making a recommendation to the protesters. Fear of vehicle attacks. Fear of causing street action. Fear of protestors who somehow figure you out better than you have figured on them. Fear of '68. Fear of having to make a decision. "We need to think a little bit before we do that," says David Bohrman, in charge of CNN’s convention coverage. "None of us knows what this is going to turn into. By everyone’s hope, it won’t be Chicago 1968." Posted by Jay Rosen journalism.nyu.edu