Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (64812)	8/27/2004 1:35:56 PM
From: R2O	Respond to of 793842

It is, is it not, a felony for a citizen to negotiate w. foreign powers? I've often wondered why no one is ever prosecuted for same.

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (64812)	8/27/2004 11:46:20 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793842

So he is doing meetings in Paris with the enemy while still a j.g. in the USNR? That is grounds to have his ass thrown in jail I would have to think. I found more evidence that proves what I was thinking. Kerry was a reservist...no question about it. I found his records that prove it. This first link is the Military Order that releases Kerry form active duty and transfers him to the Navy Reserves effective 4 Jan 1970. news.findlaw.com The second link below is the order dated 1 MAR 72 that transfers Kerry to the standby Reserves. news.findlaw.com Finally, this link is his commission contract. It clearly states he is being commissioned as a reserve officer. news.findlaw.com The real significance of all this is found at JOHNKERRY.com where it says, "April 29, 1970 Kerry listed as Registrant who has completed service." johnkerry.com And please notice at this next link, that has all the papers Kerry did release, there is absolutely no documentation or reference to registrant completing service. It is a fictitious account direct from Kerry's brain trying to cover up his unlawful activities conducted while a US Naval Officer. news.findlaw.com To me this is a clear attempt to make us believe that he was discharged in 1970. The reason to do that is so we won't think he was a US Navy Officer went he met with the North Vietnamese Delegation in Paris (twice) as that would be considered providing aid to the enemy and subject him to court-martial charges. Another reason is that when he appeared before the Senate in 71, he was deliberately wearing the uniform improperly to associate himself with a political movement. That is conduct unbecoming an officer....another serious charge..