To: tejek who wrote (612185 ) 8/28/2004 6:31:34 AM From: PROLIFE Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670 Maybe you and your boyfriend can spill on over to Boston while you are protesting naked, and get in a few licks there too.Are We a Colony of New York City? When the New York Yankees sent an airplane over Fenway Park last year to laugh at the Red Sox, the citizens became irate at this attention from New York City. But few fans understand that Massachusetts has been a colony of New York City since 1999 when the Sulzberger family, owners of the New York Times, took complete control of our major newspaper, the Boston Globe, which totally dominates the state, dictating what news we are allowed to know and what we believe. The Sulzbergers bought the Globe in 1993 for $1.1 billion, escaping scrutiny from the citizens because they promised the Taylor family, who had owned the paper since 1873, that they would remain in total charge. (The Sulzbergers also own the Worcester Telegram.) But that promise quietly ended in 1997, when a new member of the family, Pinch Sulzberger, took charge of the huge conglomerate as its Chairman. His personal objective was to impose homosexual ¡°marriage¡± across the United States. He dispatched a Senior Vice President, Richard Gilman, to Boston in 1999 to take complete charge as Publisher. The reason that Gilman arrived here that July was to assure that Margaret Marshall was confirmed as a member of the Supreme Judicial Court when she was appointed a month later. No one knew she was to be appointed except for Gov. Bill Weld, Margaret Marshall and Richard Gilman. Marshall had just made her famous speech to the Mass. Lesbian and Gay Bar Association in which she assured Atty. Mary Bonauto she would win if she brought a suit here for ¡°gay marriage.¡± Sulzberger liked that message and decided he wanted Marshall as Chief Justice of the SJC so she could implement his plan. Besides, she was his friend and wife of his most famous columnist, Anthony Lewis. But then Sally Pawlick founded Mass. Citizens for Marriage in 2000, unknowingly getting directly in Sulzberger¡¯s path. He was unable to stop the momentum of the Protection of Marriage Amendment in 2002 þu which would have totally thwarted his plans þu until he got directly involved in our state government. His newspaper encouraged the legislature to violate the Constitution and not vote on the Amendment, while falsely telling the citizens this was all perfectly legal. Now Pinch has homosexual ¡°marriage¡± imposed on this state but Pawlick is joining in the threat of the Article 8 Alliance to take it all away by Removing Judge Marshall and the three judges who helped her. Just think what an impact that will have across the entire nation as they discover that the judge who wrote the historic opinion for ¡°gay marriage¡± is nothing but a common cheat who has been removed from office! But don¡¯t expect to read about it in the Boston Globe.suppressednews.com