Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (144309)	8/28/2004 12:48:22 AM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The Press should get some refreshing new proposals to argue about next week. Both parties may wish to end the Vietnam discussions, but I question whether the liberal press will allow either party to forget. Its just too juicy a subject to ignore. Continual talk about it implies that the Iraq venture may end the same way, even if one of the events is a quarter century in the past and entirely unrelated. GOP Urge Bush to Turn Attention From Iraq .... <<<http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=5&u=/ap/20040827/ap_on_el_pr/republican_jitters_3>> Sig

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (144309)	8/28/2004 8:22:12 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

"The Bush people aren't constructing a reported 14 permanent military bases in Iraq with the intention of "being asked to leave." " They expected to be greeted with flowers as well. Reality bites and minds and plans can be changed. The question still remains as to whether kerry will be any better. As you say "there must be some reason why both sides of the aisle seem to have gotten behind this "adventure." " Kerry will have to prove to the country how tough he is while bush will have to prove to the country how flexible he is. Back to square 1. If Dean were sane he may have been the better choice for anti-war folks. Mike