SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (64957)8/28/2004 5:00:47 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793964
 

But what else did he have to run on? A consistently dovish and quite mediocre Senate career?

Mediocrity has hardly been an obstacle to success in recent elections. It's hard to imagine a more mediocre career than Bush's, and he won.

Kerry needed to pretend to be a sober moderate, and to base his campaign around the undeniable fact that he isn't Bush. There's a widespread, if largely inaccurate, perception of economic malaise in play, advanced by the ease of comparison to the bubble years. He could have played effectively on that, and he could have played effectively on the way Iraq and Afghanistan have been handled. A sober argument that the administration has tried to do the right thing the wrong way could have worked for him there.

It has not been a very impressive campaign.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (64957)8/28/2004 1:51:54 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793964
 
Debka sees the timing of the spy leak the same way I do, that either the Dems leaked it to hurt Bush during election, or else Bush leaked it to distance himself from Sharon.
debka.com

Left out is another reason for Bush leaking, "controlled burn," it's coming out anyway, head off an explosion.