SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (612823)8/28/2004 7:51:58 PM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Why doesn't BUSH sign HIS form 180?

I know you get confused easily. It has slipped your mind that George Walker Bush is President of the United States, and ex officio Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

THE CIC doesn't need to fill out military forms which would theoretically be submitted to himself. He needs only to order the Department of Defense to release all his military records, which he has done.

Kerry has no standing to order the DOD to do anything (THANK YOU LORD!). He must sign the standard 180, which would authorize DOD to release his records.



To: bentway who wrote (612823)8/28/2004 7:54:13 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Democrat Jokes and One-Liners

Q: What's the difference between a Democrat and a trampoline?

A: You take off your shoes before you jump on a trampoline.

Q: What's the difference between a Democrat and a prostitute?

A: The prostitute gives value for the money she takes.

Q: What's the difference between a dead skunk in the road and a dead Democrat in the road?

A: Vultures will eat the skunk.

Q: What's the difference between a Democrat and a catfish?

A: One is an ugly, scum sucking bottom-feeder and the other is a fish.

Q: What do you get when you cross a bad politician with a lawyer?

A: Chelsea.

Q: What do you get when you cross a pilgrim with a democrat?

A: A god-fearing tax collector who gives thanks for what other people have.

Q: Why should Democrats be buried 100 feet deep?

A: Because deep down, they're really good people.

Q: What happens when you cross a pig with a Democrat?

A: Nothing. There are some things a pig won't do.

Q: Why did God create Democrats?

A: In order to make used car salesmen look good.

Q: What is a recent Democrat graduate's usual question in his first job?

A: What would you like to have with your french fries, sir?

Q. How many Democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A. Just one, but it really gets screwed.

Q: How many Democrats does it take to change a light bulb?

A: It's irrelevant; they still don't know they're in the dark!

They say that Christopher Columbus was the first Democrat. When he left to discover America, he didn't know where he was going. When he got there he didn't know where he was. And it was all done on a government grant.



To: bentway who wrote (612823)8/28/2004 10:56:51 PM
From: jim-thompson  Respond to of 769670
 
so ben barnes is one of your idols? kind of figures.... i recall him in the national news when down there in texas you had some government and former government officals take the tax payers to the cleaners when they played their flipping game with real estate and then filed bankruptcy..

yeah barnes is a great spokesperson.....NOT.



To: bentway who wrote (612823)8/29/2004 6:27:24 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Bush's signing a 180 does not interest me at all because Bush never made his military service the basis of his campaign. He instead has all along pointed to his policies on terrorism. Since Bush, the man, has done nothing wrong that we know while in office, I think it unfair to attack him in the personal way leftists have been attacking him since he took office. This includes attacking personal history that has no relationship to the law, his role or public policies.

I have never once thought it unfair to attack Bush's policies, though I may disagree with the attacks. Heck, I myself have vigorously attacked Bush on policy. I think, for example, his view on immigration is just plain moronic. I think his "Islam is peace" claim is just pure politics (i.e. just plain crap). And I have said these things right here, repeatedly and without reservation. Nevertheless because Bush, the man, has thus far conducted himself honorably, I have no basis to attack the guy as you have.

Leftists are being dishonorable. There is just no other way to look at the thing. Bush's military records are irrelevant here because they serve as the basis for neither his campaign nor his policies. Demanding them is just an attempt to wage yet another dishonorable personal attack on the guy. So I will leave that to people like you - people who have no self-respect, no honor or integrity - people who are quite essentially un-American.

Getting at the truth beneath Kerry's Vietnam record is not only legitimate, it is an absolute requirement. Had Kerry not run on Vietnam, I scarcely doubt this story would have even the slightest bit of traction. But since Kerry is claiming Vietnam makes him worthy to be President, his opponents absolutely must try to get at the truth concerning his role in that war and its aftermath. Again, Vietnam is the credential upon which Kerry now relies to justify why he should be president. America now has a duty to vet him first on the basis of that credential, then on all else.

The fastest and easiest way for America to accomplish this is to have Kerry sign the 180. If Kerry will not officially verify his volunteered basis of his own campaign, then there is just no choice for his opponents but to dump on him until either he signs the form or is politically ruined.

Now I've made some wondrously good sense here in this post. You know it is all true without even one fault. But you are a leftist, and we all know leftists are liars. So you will ignore the truth. That is okay.