SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (9062)9/12/2004 8:07:40 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Afghan Government Removes a Powerful Regional Leader
The New York Times
September 12, 2004

By CARLOTTA GALL

ABUL, Afghanistan, Sept. 11 - The Afghan government on Saturday announced
the removal of the powerful governor of Herat, in western Afghanistan,
one of the country's longest standing warlords. The move appeared to be
intended to undercut the governor, one of the major opponents
to President Hamid Karzai, before the Oct. 9 presidential elections.

The removal of the governor, Ismail Khan, is momentous for the central
government, which has tried without success to reduce his power or
remove him for the last two years. Following Mr. Karzai's removal
of the defense minister, Marshal Muhammad Qasim Fahim, from
the presidential ticket last month, the action on Saturday was
one of the boldest moves by Mr. Karzai in nearly three years in
office to reduce the power of the warlords.


The government announced the removal as a promotion, saying Mr. Khan was being appointed the new minister of mines and industries, but the governor was clearly reluctant to leave and told local radio that he would not accept the ministerial post but would remain in Herat.

Mr. Khan has dominated western Afghanistan for more than 20 years -as a mujahedeen commander fighting the Soviet Army and later the Taliban, and as undisputed ruler of Herat for a period in the 1990's and for nearly three years since the fall of the Taliban in 2001. He has resisted any control by the central government and has kept a tight hold on the local political and economic scene.

Weakened by two military attacks against his soldiers this year and the assassination in March of his son, Mirwais Siddiq, the minister of civil aviation, he finally relented to government pressure this week.
He told a local radio station on Saturday that he had accepted the government's decision to replace him but probably would not go to Kabul because it was not a post for which he was qualified, said Muhammadullah Afzali, chief of the government's foreign department in Herat.

"He has said that he will stay where he is right now, not as a governor but as a private citizen, and that he will work for the security and prosperity of Herat," said a Western diplomat, who was in telephone contact with Mr. Khan on Saturday. Discussions would continue about a future post, the diplomat said.

"It is also true that he is disappointed, he's unhappy," the diplomat said. Mr. Khan had hoped to remain as governor until after the elections, the diplomat said.

The government moved quickly to put in a new appointee, Sayed Muhammad Khairkhwa, who had served as ambassador to Iran and most recently to Ukraine. The new governor would go to Herat on Sunday, or Monday, said a presidential spokesman, Jawed Ludin.

Extra troops were sent in from the Afghan National Army and members of the National Police and National Security Directorate on Saturday afternoon. About 1,000 soldiers were guarding positions in the city of Herat, in case anyone tried to take advantage of the transition of power, said a Defense Ministry spokesman, Gen. Muhammad Zaher Azimi.

In a sign of tension, United States forces opened fire on supporters of Mr. Khan
who had gathered in the city to demonstrate and threw stones at an
American vehicle, the police chief, Ziamuddin Mahmudi, said.
Two demonstrators were injured, he said.


Mr. Khan's removal is part of larger changes in the region designed to stabilize the area.
The governor of the neighboring province of Ghor, and one of Mr. Khan's opponents, also was removed and given an advisory post in the Interior Ministry. Amanullah Khan, who began the recent fighting by attacking the Shindand air base, south of Herat, is under control of the intelligence service, the National Security Directorate in Kabul.
The governor's removal will help Mr. Karzai in the election by opening up the political scene and removing his political control of the region, the diplomat said.
nytimes.com

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company |



To: Mephisto who wrote (9062)10/9/2004 5:45:01 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Afghan Candidates Declare Results 'Invalid'
Opponents Complain of Multiple Vote-Casting, Improper Procedures

By Pamela Constable
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, October 9, 2004; 1:42 PM

KABUL, Afghanistan, Oct. 9 -- After a relatively peaceful and orderly start, Afghanistan's first-ever presidential election was thrown into chaos Saturday after 15 candidates opposing President Hamid Karzai declared the results invalid, complaining of multiple vote-casting and other improper procedures.

The contretemps threatened to ruin the credibility of an historic poll that has cost the international community almost $200 million to stage, attracted more than 10 million Afghans to register as voters, and been viewed as a crucial milestone in Afghanistan's emergence from 25 years of war and turmoil into a stable, modernizing country.

The candidates' complaints stood in sharp contrast to the enthusiastic spirit of hundreds of thousands of Afghans who lined up outside village schools and mosques on a chilly, windswept morning to cast the first vote of their lives. Whoever won, they told visitors over and over, they hoped the election would bring peace and security. The national election commission said in mid-afternoon it would allow the election to continue despite the candidates' protests but that it would investigate any complaints of irregularities. Ballot-counting was expected to take days because many polling stations were located in remote areas.

"Given the complexities of this electoral process, there have inevitably been some technical problems," said J. Ray Kennedy, an election commission official. But given the large turnout and "peaceful environment" of the vote thus far, he said, it would be "unjustified" to halt the election and deny many Afghans their fundamental rights.

Karzai, who has been heavily favored to win
a majority of votes, said Saturday evening that
the election had been "free and fair." He
urged all candidates to accept the results
as legitimate and to "respect our people,
because in the dust and snow and rain,
they waited hours and hours to vote."

But his opponents, a range of ethnic politicians,
former officials, tribal leaders and professionals,
declared repeatedly during the day that the
election should be nullified, suspended and
held again, largely because of a widespread
mix-up over indelible ink that was supposed
to mark voters' thumbs to prevent repeat voting.

"Any government that comes to power as a result of today's election has no credibility and no validity," said Abdul Sitar Seerat, a former cabinet minister and one of Karzai's challengers, after the remaining opposition candidates met for much of the afternoon at his home.

Originally there were 18 candidates including Karzai, but two withdrew to support him on Wednesday.

The unexpected controversy came as a shock to Afghan and international election officials, who had warned against terrorist violence at the polls by former Taliban fighters and other anti-democratic forces, but who never expected the candidates themselves to cast doubt on a process that experts had spent months preparing.

There were numerous scattered incidents of violence and anti-election plots reported during the day, but most were in remote provinces. An unprecedented deployment of nearly 100,000 Afghan and foreign security forces, who sealed off all major roads and guarded most polling centers, appeared to have staved off any major anti-election attacks.

Police said they discovered a fuel tanker truck carrying landmines and explosives in the southern city of Kandahar, and arrested three Pakistanis in it. They said the volatile cargo could have been detonated in the city, causing election-day mayhem. Interior Ministry officials said they found explosives or other dangerous items in cars throughout the capital, and arrested a group of Taliban members who were holding a clandestine meeting.

Most voters cast their ballots without difficulty and went home, unaware of the candidates' protest until long afterward. Many appeared to find the first-time experience confusing and a little intimidating, but election workers explained the procedure carefully over and over, and voters of all ages seemed eager and proud to be taking part.

"This is something Afghans have wished for deeply, and for a long time," said Gulab Niakzai, 47, a colonel in the new national army who had just voted at a high school in Kargah, a district west of Kabul. His wife Shirin, dressed in tailored black, smiled at his side.

"We want a clean government and an honest, patriotic president," Niakzai said. "Every Afghan should think very carefully about this decision, because we are building a future for our children."

On a windy highway in Wardak province south of the capital, a cluster of men and women in billowing blue veils trudged along with their children, heading toward a distant polling station. Rassool Dad, 25, a mason who recently brought his family back from long exile in Iran, carried his 9-month-old son in his arms.

"We are going to elect our president," Dad said proudly. "We want to stop the warlords and the bloodshed. We heard that the Taliban might attack polling stations, but if we were afraid we wouldn't come out of our houses."

During a day-long tour of polling sites in three provinces, a Washington Post reporter saw many instances in which polling workers mistakenly inked the voters' thumbs with black ballot-marking ink instead of purple indelible ink.

Voters expressed concern at the ease with which the black ink rubbed off, but no one at a dozen polling stations, including officially designated "agents" for various candidates, complained of deliberate fraud.

Other problems with logistics and staffing, especially the complicated arrangements made so women could vote separately, also seemed to be handled good-naturedly. In De Afghanan, a village in Wardak, a local Muslim cleric had offered his front parlor as a women's voting site, but several hours after the men's polling station opened, no female election workers had arrived from Kabul.

"We called the U.N. several times, but no one has come," said Mahmad Aziz, 60, the local election supervisor. Finally he designated a group of male elders to act as go-betweens so local women could vote without being seen.

"We want everyone to be able to vote freely," he said. "We took an oath that none of us would put pressure on anyone."
Around him, a long line of men squeezed into a dark stone village classroom, clutching their voter registration cards. One election worker inked their thumbs and punched a hole in their cards. Another showed them the long ballot with 18 names and tiny photographs. After the voter emerged from a small booth covered in gingham cloth, another worker took each ballot and stuffed it into a white plastic box.

Most voters said they understood that their ballot was secret, and many were shy or even cagey about expressing their preference after voting. But in many places, people said they planned to vote for Karzai, saying he was an honest man and had worked hard for the country. Karzai was named interim president in late 2001 under a U.N.-sponsored democratization process that has already advanced through two national assemblies, a new constitution and voter registration.

Despite the careful procedures, opposition
candidates said there was ample room for fraud,
especially because so many voters' thumbs were
not marked with indelible ink. They alleged
that large numbers of people had voted several
times, and that government officials had pressured
some to vote for Karzai.

"We have received reports of people voting
10 and 15 times," said Humayun Shah Assefy,
a lawyer who is running for president.
"Under these conditions, elections have
no meaning. We do not want a boycott,
we want a postponement, and we want
better supervision."


To some extent, the suspicion of multiple voting was exacerbated by the very success of the voter registration drive. Initially, experts predicted perhaps 7 million to 8 million people would register, but the final number was more than 10.5 million. Critics said many people had registered several times, but international and Afghan officials said there was little that could be done about it.




To: Mephisto who wrote (9062)10/10/2004 1:38:37 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Panel to Probe Fraud Claims in Afghan Vote


By DANIEL COONEY, Associated Press Writer

latimes.com

KABUL, Afghanistan - An independent commission will probe claims by all
15 challengers to interim leader Hamid Karzai that Afghanistan's first direct
presidential election was marred by incompetence and fraud, a top official said
Sunday.


The move to head off the attack on the vote's legitimacy came as workers
began the long process of collecting ballots from Saturday's historic election,
in which Karzai was a heavy favorite. Counting was to start Monday and was
expected to take two to three weeks.

A day after the
challengers announced
they would boycott the
election's outcome, two
backed off, saying they
wanted a commission to
rule on whether the voting
was fair and indicating
they would accept its
decision.

A few hours later, their demand appeared to have
been met.

"There is going to be an independent commission
made to investigate it," said electoral director
Farooq Wardak. "There could be mistakes; we
are just human beings. My colleagues might have made a mistake."

There was no immediate reaction from the challengers, but U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad and
other officials were reportedly meeting behind closed doors with many of the candidates.

What was supposed to be a historic day in this war-ravaged nation turned sour hours after voting
started when the 15 accused the government and the United Nations of fraud and incompetence over
faulty ink used to mark people's thumbs to prevent multiple voting.

The complaint by the 15 drew criticism from international electoral observers.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe said Sunday the demand to nullify the poll
was unjustified. The U.S. International Republican Institute called the ballot "a triumph" and accused the
challengers of trying to make up excuses for why they were likely to lose.

Electoral officials said turnout looked extremely high -- a victory in itself in a nation with no experience
at direct elections.

On Sunday, ballots were being carried to eight centers around the country, where they were being
readied for counting. Tabulation was not expected to start until Monday.

Very early results could emerge a day or so later. But electoral spokesman Aykut Tavsel added, "I
don't think we will see a trend as to who is leading for about a week." He said final results could take
until Oct. 30.

At a counting center on Kabul's outskirts, sealed bags of votes were brought in from surrounding areas
and were being sorted by dozens of workers.

In Mazar-e-Sharif, election officials said they had not received ballots that were supposed to be flowing
in from five northern provinces. They said it could take until Tuesday or Wednesday for ballots to
arrive from remote villages.

Widespread attacks threatened by the Taliban to disrupt the vote never materialized. The rebels
managed a smattering of deadly assaults around the country, but they themselves took the biggest hit,
losing 25 men in a clash with U.S. and Afghan forces in the south.

Lt. Gen. David Barno, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, told The Associated Press in a phone
interview that the election could sound the rebels' death knell.

"The Taliban basically didn't show. They had very limited attacks," he said. "Yesterday was a huge
defeat for the Taliban."

He predicted Taliban leaders would "eventually look for ways to reconcile with the government that
comes in."

In the end, faulty ink -- not bombs and bullets -- threatened three years of painstaking progress toward
democracy. The 15 presidential candidates claimed the ink used to mark voters' thumbs rubbed off too
easily, raising the possibility that people could vote more than once.

U.N. and Afghan electoral officials said the problem had been corrected and rejected demands that
voting be stopped at midday Saturday, saying it would rob millions of people of their first chance to
directly decide their leader.

Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador, also backed the vote. "The Afghan nation has spoken -- it has voted
for democracy and freedom," he said.

Still, a successful democracy needs an opposition that accepts election results. Even if the vote is
validated, Karzai's ability to unite the nation, fight warlords and crush the Taliban insurgency might be
undermined if his opponents refused to recognize the vote's legitimacy.

Karzai called "the election was free and fair."

On Sunday, ethnic Hazara candidate Mohammed Mohaqeq said an electoral commission should be
formed to examine the vote and later distanced himself from the challengers' threat to boycott the
results.

"To boycott and to criticize are two different things. Their position is to boycott. My position is to
criticize," he told reporters outside a mosque where he had come to pray.

The only woman in the election, Massooda Jalal, also indicated she might accept a commission's
finding.

The opposition protest was an embarassment to the international community, which spent $200 million
putting on the election.

But the boycott was largely ignored by officials in Washington, which financed much of the election and
led the military campaign that ousted the Taliban nearly three years ago. President Bush called the vote
a "marvelous thing."

About 10.5 million registration cards were handed out for the election, a number that U.N. and Afghan
officials say was inflated by widespread double registration. Organizers had argued that indelible ink
marking voters' thumbs would prevent people from voting twice.

* __

Associated Press reporters Stephen Graham in Kandahar, Burt Herman in Mazar-e-Sharif and Amir
Shah and Paul Haven in Kabul contributed to this report.