Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (65417)	8/30/2004 3:24:05 AM
From: RMF	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 794283

The two tallest buildings in the country had been hit, but you're saying that until the pentagon was hit it didn't count? So if they had nuked Chicago it would have been OK as long as no military targets were under attack? I would expect a president to go out and FIND information and assess the situation. The secret service IS NOT there to discuss national security matters. I only bring it up again because I see people questioning Kerry's ability to command NOT based on what he did under fire, but on what he did AFTER the war. What Kerry said after he came home was a LOT OF CRAP and I agree with the Viet Vets for their comments about it. But I haven't heard ANY proof that Kerry wasn't solid when under fire, and I have seen ON FILM what Bush was like under fire and I don't think Bush acted the way a guy that passes himself off as a war president should have acted.