Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.T. who wrote (18573)	8/30/2004 11:28:38 AM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 19219

>>READ THE POST AGAIN SLOWLY and COMPLETELY<< read it slowly twice, JT. I don't mean any offense -- just don't share you view that we are right -- by definition. in the present environment it is considered heretical to say that we should have pursued Osama instead of "nation-building." It is interesting how few options were weighed in both matters -- One thing I do know Osama is still at large, three years after 9/11. OK, two Iraq would be in civil war tomorrow if we withdrew our forces. Doesn't really matter, though -- if we do leave it will happen (course, we may not be leaving period -- this is what I thought all along). I'll quit now. We have different opinions as to what should be pursued there ...