Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Virginia Tech Hokies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fizz who wrote (408)	8/30/2004 11:27:56 PM
From: gregor	Respond to of 1332

Personally, I feel that USC would have still won. Our guys in the 4th qtr had run out of steam and Randall was having a hard go of it. Norm Chow had played it close all night and really not had that many long balls. Tech's safety was inching up on most plays to stuff the run and the short passes and when they went long we were out of position. The defensive line was not putting the rush on that they had in the first half and gave the qb an extra second or two. It was a gallant effort but in the end you have to hand it to USC. They made the plays when they had to.

To: Fizz who wrote (408)	9/12/2004 7:48:31 PM
From: gregor	Respond to of 1332

Lot of empty seats at the WMU game but the traffic was decent and the parking in the public lot was about 50% full. The freshman receivers stold the show. Bell will be awesome. He hooked up with his hs qb for 2 tds is that impressive. Glennon at one point was 4 for 4 and 2 tds and one of the receptions was to himself. Is that a weird start to a college career. In a way I hope Vick does not come back: I just think that it will cause too much controversy over qbs again next year. I do believe that Vick loses a year of eligibility so he would only have two years left next year and Glennon could start his last two years What do you think about the qb situation.....Gregor