Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (65592)	8/30/2004 5:27:48 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794298

I think they cojoin when the fetus is viable. Call me picky, as I'm sure you will, at least under your breath, but the concepts don't conjoin. Rather instances of each coincide. Sort of like condo apartments. Almost all high-rise apartments are rentals. Almost all real estate sits on the ground with sky above. The concept of living in a box aloft in a big building and that of owning a home coincide. That doesn't muddy the distinction between the separate concepts of owning real estate and high-rise apartment houses. As for the viable fetus, I agree with you that that is the most appropriate demarcation between the overwhelming preference for interests of the woman and shared interests between her and the fetus. Morally, that is. Not necessarily legally.