Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (199063)	8/30/2004 8:50:13 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574260

re: WHAT proposals? The usual nitwit liberal crapola is all we've heard. OK, argue against his "nitwit liberal crapole". Just be specific. re: How about his Senate record? Seems to me THAT's where the focus ought to be. But he KNOWS when his Senate record is exposed, it is OVER. OK, compare what Kerry did 10 years ago v. Bush, 15 years ago, 20 years ago, 25 years ago. Let's compare records, year, by year, by year. Name the year you want to begin. Bush has never accomplish anything except to throw the country into deficit, engender the hate of traditional allies, disrupt the peace in the ME, use lies to pass new massive entitlements, kill 1000 US kids in a worthless war, divide the country and unite the world against us, disrespect the great office of the President of the US with continual lies... He's the worst ever; Kerry would be a breeze of fresh air from the current stink from the White House. John

To: i-node who wrote (199063)	8/31/2004 4:36:29 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574260

>How about his Senate record? Seems to me THAT's where the focus ought to be. But he KNOWS when his Senate record is exposed, it is OVER. Let's hear it. Steve showed it off the other day, and it seems decent to me, though a bit to the right of where I'd like it. Why isn't he running on his Senate record? Two reasons. -A Senate record can't be compressed into soundbites the way a Presidential record can -He's not getting the chance -- he had to run on his war record because it gives him a leg up on Bush in the strength department when he's being attacked by the Republicans for being weak (and "looking French") at a time where the people are convinced (I'd argue wrongly) that they're in grave danger -Z