To: American Spirit who wrote (45838 ) 8/31/2004 1:00:35 AM From: techguerrilla Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 81568 Kerry's going to fry Bush's ass in each debate ... Part 2 I am amazed at Bush. Another gaffe today saying the war on terror is unwinnable. The funny thing is, though, that Bush is right. Terrorists can really only be contained. Just ask Israel and France. They have been containing terrorists for years. Bush should never have said we could win the war on terror. He did a good job attacking the terrorists in Afghanistan. If he'd pursued Osama bin Laden, he would have done a good job of containing the terrorists. Instead, the Taliban is resurfacing and their drug trade will keep them in dough. By going to Iraq, Bush redefined the "war on terror." An all out war against Islamic extremists throughout the Middle East is, of course, unwinnable. The craziest thing that came out today was Edwards saying the war on terror was winnable. What "war on terror"? The crazy "war on terror" as defined by Bush--an all out war against Islamic extremists throughout the Middle East? That, I'm sorry to say, my dear John Edwards, is not winnable. Kerry needs to tell the American public that the war on terror needs to be turned into a sensible plan of basic American security and that we can't roam around the world fighting an aggressive, offensive war on terror. Our allies haven't supported Bush in the "war on terror" as defined by Bush and it will not support Kerry unless he redefines the "war on terror." I thought we were going to have to wait for the debates for Bush to come up with a great gaffe. As I said today, "I can't even wait to see what kind of quick-'thinking' mistake Bush makes in one of the debates." (I'm quoting myself. LMFAO.)Message 20466090 Bush, though, can strike any time, any where, and any place. /john