Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (617361)	9/3/2004 12:18:13 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

poor poor kevie, it's the spitball stupid. LOL....

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (617361)	9/3/2004 12:23:02 PM
From: microhoogle!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Kerry campaign is being a sissy in complaining. Considering the mud raking abilities of Republican campaigns in general, they should be out-campaigning Rove/Bush in that department as well. Clinton team did that Bush Sr. who was man enough to admit that he was beaten fair and square.

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (617361)	9/3/2004 12:32:04 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"Now, with their obvious connections to the Swiftie Liar O'Neill" Is it ok for Kerry to lie about his service iyo? "Kerry and Edwards tried to get the President to condemn the untrue ads" They were not entirely untrue. As Kerry's portrayal of his service was not entirely true. He was an idiot to make his 4 months in viet nam the cornerstone of his run for Presidency. I have heard also (but not confirmed) that Kerry actually signed up for the Navy's version of the National gaurd, but then got put into service. Is that true? If so, his motivations were the same as Bush's, weren't they? "all meant to hide his miserable failures in life," Pretty funny what you consider a "miserable failure". Wonder how your life stacks up against our President's. Wish I could fail so miserably. LOL "Let's open up your guy's record Vietnam record, and Cheney's five convenient deferments" It's already been done, hasn't it? You know about Bush's service, you know about Cheney's deferments. You know about Clinton's lack of service in Viet Nam. Were you as against him too? Is it imperitive that a President (or potential President) serve in Viet Nam iyo? Is everybody that did not serve contemtable iyo, or is it just those that you already hate that you can whack with this charge? Seems like you would see the hipocricy in embracing Clinton and then attacking Bush. You obvioulsy don't. But it is biting you and your party on the butt, and hurting you big time. Keep it up. Really go after the President's Gaurd service. Maybe the 3rd round of attacks will really get you somewhere. "Pandora's box is now open, thanks to Bush and Rove" The Pandora's box has been opened by Kennedy, Gore, Kerry, McAulliff, moveon.org and many other dems who lied about our CinC. Now it is coming back at you, and it is funny to see you whining like little babies.