SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (54645)9/3/2004 4:03:27 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
TIME mag: Bush Opens Double-Digit Lead

TIME Poll: Among likely voters, 52% would vote for President George Bush, while 41% would vote for John Kerry and 3% would vote for Ralph Nader

Friday, Sep. 03, 2004
New York: For the first time since the Presidential race became a two person contest last spring, there is a clear leader, the latest TIME poll shows. If the 2004 election for President were held today, 52% of likely voters surveyed would vote for President George W. Bush, 41% would vote for Democratic nominee John Kerry, and 3% would vote for Ralph Nader, according to a new TIME poll conducted from Aug. 31 to Sept. 2. Poll results are available on TIME.com and will appear in the upcoming issue of TIME magazine, on newsstands Monday, Sept. 6.

Most important issues: When asked what they consider are the most important issues, 25% of registered voters cited the economy as the top issue, followed by 24% who cited the war on terrorism as the top issue. The situation in Iraq was rated the top issue by 17% of registered voters, moral values issues such as gay marriage and abortion were the top issue for 16% of respondents, and health care was the most important issue for 11% of respondents.

Bush vs. Kerry:
The economy: 47% trust President Bush more to handle the economy, while 45% trust Kerry.
Health care: 48% trust Senator Kerry to handle health care issues, while 42% trust Bush.
Iraq: 53% trust Bush to handle the situation in Iraq, while 41% trust Kerry.
Terrorism: 57% trust Bush to handle the war on terrorism, while 36% trust Kerry.
Understanding the needs of people: 47% said they trust Kerry to understand the needs of people like themselves, while 44% trusted Bush to understand their needs.
Providing strong leadership: 56% said they trust Bush to provide strong leadership in difficult times, while 37% said they trust Kerry to provide leadership in difficult times.
Tax policy: 49% trust Bush to handle tax policy, while 40% trust Kerry.
Commanding the Armed Forces: 54% said they trust Bush to be commander-in-chief of the armed forces, while 39% said they trust Kerry.

Bush on the Issues:
Iraq: Half (50%) of those surveyed approve of the way President Bush is handling the situation in Iraq, while 46% disapprove. In last week’s TIME poll, 48% approved of the way Bush was handling the situation in Iraq and 48% disapproved.
Terrorism: Almost two thirds (59%) said they approve of how President Bush is handling the war on terrorism, while 38% disapprove. Last week’s TIME poll found 55% approved of Bush’s handling of the war on terrorism, while 40% disapproved.
The Economy: Survey respondents were split on the President’s handling of the economy. Almost half (48%) said the approved of Bush’s handling of the economy, while 48% said the disapproved.

Other results include:
Was U.S. Right Going to War with Iraq? Over half of those surveyed (52%) think the U.S. was right in going to war with Iraq, while 41% think the U.S. was wrong to go to war.

Have the United States’ actions in Iraq made the world safer? Almost half (45%) think the United States’ actions in Iraq have made the world safer, while 45% think the world is more dangerous. In a similar TIME poll taken Aug. 3 – 5, over half (52%) said the world was more dangerous, and 38% said the world was safer.

# # #

Methodology: The TIME Poll was conducted August 31 – September 2 by telephone among a random sample of 1,316 adults, including 1,128 reported registered voters and 926 likely voters. The margin of error for registered voters is +/- 3% points, and +/- 4% points for likely voters. Schulman, Ronca, & Bucuvalas (SRBI) Public Affairs conducted the poll, and more complete results are attached.

Contacts:
Ty Trippet, 212-522-3640
Jennifer Zawadzinski, 212-522-9046



To: TigerPaw who wrote (54645)9/3/2004 4:49:50 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
From Washington Dispatch.com...
_____________________________________

Commentary
The Bush Shift
Commentary by Chad Allen
September 3, 2004

In sports, the phrase “it’s all about momentum” is oftentimes heard, as teams that capture momentum in a game can erase huge deficits or turn a close game into a rather lopsided victory. Momentum is every bit as important in politics and, prior to the Republican Convention this week, the data showed that overall momentum is clearly on the side of President Bush in his reelection bid. Of even greater note, are the areas in which the momentum has shifted to President Bush from Senator Kerry.

On the political modeling front, President Bush is looking quite strong. Political modelers use a series of economic, social, and political variables and through mathematics and regression attempt to predict the outcome of an election.

This week in Chicago at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, six professors and political modelers were to participate in a roundtable discussion. Each of the six professors, using their models, predicts that President Bush will win 51% up to nearly 55% of the popular vote. Noted Yale economic and political modeler, Ray C. Fair, predicts an even greater 57.5% of the popular vote for Bush. Mr. Fair’s model, when applied in retrospect to the past 22 presidential elections since World War I, has accurately predicted the winner on 19 occasions, or in 86% of the elections.

What does the market have to say about Bush’s current position in the race? One of the best market-based predictors of political outcomes is the political future trading at the University of Iowa’s Electronic Markets. In this real-money market, individuals are able to trade futures on certain economic and political events. For the “presidential winner-take-all” futures, the candidate’s “future” price is reflective of the likely popular vote he would receive. Since August 13 when Senator Kerry’s future traded at 50, his future has never again reached 50 and as of the end of August it was at 47. President Bush’s future, which dipped to 49.1 on August 13, has steadily climbed and at the end of August was at 54.

Another well-known market for trading futures on political and social events is the Dublin-based Intrade Exchange. On the question of whether George W. Bush will be elected President, Bush’s future traded at 58 this week, while John Kerry’s was at 43. In fact, Kerry’s future, which was initiated in January, has been trending towards a new lifetime low. However, Bush’s future is on an upward trend.

If you believe in the mantra held closely by most on Wall Street that the financial markets, which include futures on equities, commodities, and currency rates, are always right, then you have to say that the political market is ahead of the curve verses the polling data. However, even the polling data are trending more favorably towards President Bush.

On the eve of the Republican National Convention, the highly regarded Rasmussen Reports Electoral College Projection put George W. Bush ahead of Senator John Kerry for the first time this year. Bush stands at 213 electoral votes, while Kerry has 207 votes with 118 votes to close to call.

Looking at the contest on an issue by issue basis, Bush is also seeing strong upward movement. In an ABC News/Washington Post poll taken last week, both John Kerry and George Bush carried 48% of the respondents’ votes, all of which were labeled as likely voters. However, Kerry’s strength on several issues showed dramatic erosion.

On the issue of who registered voters trusted more, Kerry led bush by 52-41 on August 1, but a 12-point swing has allowed Bush to pull ahead to hold a 48-47 advantage as of late August. Senator Kerry has also seen a 13-point net loss on the education issue, a 12-point loss on healthcare, and an eight-point loss on taxes.

The poll also indicated disturbing trends for Kerry among specific voter groups. Kerry had held a 50-44 advantage among registered voters on August 1, but Bush has closed the gap and now leads Kerry 48-47, again these are pre-convention numbers. Among women voters, Kerry has lost 11 points in the last month and six points among men.

For Bush, the poll shows that he has gained significant ground verses Kerry on what most consider his weakest issue, the economy. Bush has added seven points among all respondents, 13 among seniors, and a whopping 15 points among respondents in battleground states.

In fact the battleground state data are especially troubling for the Kerry camp. While Kerry’s favorability rating has dropped eight points overall, the poll shows that it had declined 14 points among those in battleground dates. The data may be indicative of Kerry struggling in his quest to capture the undecided voter in these key states.

Even democratic strategists have acknowledged the trend in recent days. In a polling memo from Democracy Corps, a group led by James Carville, the group stated that Bush appears to be making inroads versus Kerry.

How has the Bush shift occurred? While the Swift Boat ads and book have certainly played a part, perhaps the shift is due in large par to the Bush team’s early and primary focus on its base, Christian conservatives. In an article in Monday’s Wall Street Journal, it was noted how campaign strategist Karl Rove made Christian conservatives the focus very early in the campaign, realizing that they were not only the most likely to actually vote on Election Day, but that they also would provide an enormous among of foot soldiers.

Apparently the strategy is working. Even though the Republican Convention has included Rudy Giuliani, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and New York Governor George Pataki, all of whom are pro-abortion and in favor of same-sex unions, Christian conservatives appear to remain happy and loyal. The Chairman of the Christian conservative group, Traditional Values Coalition, who is at the Convention, recently spoke about the moderate speaker list, “Their talk is for the independent people watching on television.”

If Christian conservatives remain happy and Bush receives any sizable Convention Bounce, then the predictions of political modelers may be quite prophetic.

___________________________

Chad Allen is a Christian Conservative living in America's Heartland where he writes political and social commentary. Mr. Allen has been published in Insight Magazine and various online magazines. Mr. Allen holds an MBA from Southern Illinois University.

© Copyright 2004 The Washington Dispatch

washingtondispatch.com



To: TigerPaw who wrote (54645)9/4/2004 9:04:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
"Let me tell you in no uncertain terms what makes someone unfit for
office and unfit for duty," Kerry continued. "Misleading our nation into war
in Iraq makes you unfit to lead our country.

"Doing nothing while this nation loses millions of jobs makes you unfit to
lead this country," he said. "Letting 45 million Americans go without
health care for four years makes you unfit to lead this country.

"Letting the Saudi royal family control the price of oil for Americans
makes you unfit to lead this country."