Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (144896)	9/3/2004 5:47:07 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

"If you invade one country that is abusive and dangerous, it doesn't mean you are required to invade all abusive and dangerous countries." Why dont folks get this? Iraq was done because it was deemed doable. It hasnt neccessarily gone according to plan. Iran and NK present other problems that dont warrant military action at this time. MIke

To: TimF who wrote (144896)	9/4/2004 12:54:33 PM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Respond to of 281500

>>If you invade one country that is abusive and dangerous, it doesn't mean you are required to invade all abusive and dangerous countries.<<< You are not " required " to invade ANY country,but if you invade one for reasons that don’t hold up under scrutiny , and avoid confronting others that will,you have left yourself open to the charge that you invaded Said country for suspicious reasons.That’s where this administration sits today,with more and more evidence surfacing that the invasion was largely,not entirely mind you,but largely for the benefit of Israel. This once theory,now a fairly well concluded fact , is where this admin. Reveals it dishonesty with the American people, and the rest of the World for that matter.Wars affect us all,and I find it repulsive and of great concern that a group of narrow minded and self serving neocons have taken control of our good neighbour’s military and Foreign policy infrastructure. The question now is…who’s next if Bush gets elected? Because you can be sure that if they got away with this charade and won re-election , there will be nothing,and I mean nothing , stopping the expansion of the Neo – Judea –Christian crusade against the Muslems,both in the ME, and right here in your own back yard, or mine. But hey!...maybe that’s what you want.Maybe deep inside those voting for Bush really are Crusaders. That would explain a lot of things,wouldn’t it?<GGG> --KC--