Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (66810)	9/3/2004 6:44:23 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793838

explainer How Does Bypass Surgery Work? What they'll do to Clinton's heart. By Brendan I. Koerner SLATE Former President Bill Clinton, who was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital today after complaining of chest pains, will soon undergo a heart bypass operation. How does this life-saving surgical procedure work? A coronary bypass provides a detour for blood on its way to the heart. The creation of such an indirect route is necessary when one of the heart's arteries becomes clogged with fat and cholesterol, a condition that can cause symptoms ranging from mild chest pains to massive fatal heart attacks. The operation is one of the most common major medical procedures in the United States, with over 500,000 of the surgeries performed every year. In the most widely performed procedure, an anesthetized patient's chest is cut is open, and the breastbone is sawed apart. The heart is stopped with medication for the duration of the operation; a heart-lung machine keeps oxygenated blood flowing. The vein or artery that will eventually serve as the detour around the clogged section of the heart is then taken from somewhere else in the patient's body. Surgeons typically choose the saphenous vein from the leg since its removal does not cause any future ambulatory problems. (There may be some swelling in the days following the operation, but this can be alleviated by keeping the leg aloft.) Other popular choices are the internal mammary artery from the chest and the radial artery from the arm. The blood vessel is then grafted onto the top and bottom of the clogged section of the coronary artery, so the blood can route around the blockage. It is common for surgeons to do several such grafts, to tackle multiple blockages; there are reports that President Clinton will have four grafts, which means his operation will be a quadruple bypass. There are some alternative approaches to performing a coronary bypass, most notably a less invasive option that now accounts for between 10 percent and 20 percent of all such operations. This procedure requires an incision that's just 3 inches long, compared to the 8-inch incision used for the traditional method. Also, the breastbone doesn't have to be sawed open. But it's primarily used for single or double bypasses, so it's probably not a viable option in President Clinton's case. There are also some surgeons who operate on a still-beating heart, albeit one that's been slowed down with drugs. This requires a great deal of skill but is preferable if it can be done correctly; some patients can react badly to blood pumped via a heart-lung machine. The odds for the president's complete recovery are quite good. The success rate for coronary bypass surgery is between 95 percent and 98 percent, and President Clinton isn't considered a high-risk patient because he's under 70 years old, he's male, he hasn't had prior heart surgery, and he doesn't have any other serious medical conditions. The post-surgical side effects he'll encounter are mostly mild: a poor appetite, constipation, insomnia, depression, and short-term memory problems. Next question? Brendan I. Koerner is a contributing editor at Wired and a fellow at the New America Foundation. Article URL: slate.msn.com

To: LindyBill who wrote (66810)	9/3/2004 6:47:18 PM
From: Captain Jack	Respond to of 793838

<<"In other words, medical care marches backward in Ontario">> did Kerry & Kennedy write their policy? Sounds like this weeks Kerry plan,, but it will not be tomorrow,,,maybe again on Monday??

To: LindyBill who wrote (66810)	9/3/2004 7:59:36 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh	Respond to of 793838

The story on the hospital funding in Ontario is not at all what you think it is. In the past there has not been sufficient financial discipline in Ontario hospitals. In past years when the hospitals have a deficit at the end of the year the government has bailed then out. Now, the hospitals will have to get better control on their overhead and administrative costs. The alleged shortfall is about 1% of total costs. Better financial management is all that is needed. Their will be no service cuts. They are trying to get public sympathy while negotiating with the Ministry of Health.