Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (21703)	9/3/2004 11:32:54 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 173976

Just hang in there. The best thing you can do for ALL our investments is get rid of Dumbya. He's a disaster for the investor. Work to lift ALL boats.

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (21703)	9/4/2004 4:45:23 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Personally I will be glad when this election is over and I can concentrate on finance, economics and investing (the reasons I came to SI). Promise? Even when Bush wins? If they ask me to stop banning posters, I will stop immediately (of course). A little late. The way the TOU read, you're already in violation and should be terminated along with Chinu. Which would be a great service to the site. I've informed SI Dave and they are hoping to add an "assistant" feature to moderate threads to the new site. THis is like saying that if you are caught doing 60 mph in a 50 zone that is LATER changed to 60, you are not guilty. The hate PMs I receive are unbelievable. Hey, if they're THAT bad, take them to Dave. PMs can violate the TOU too. Because I ban posters on a thread that are not following the rules of the thread? Cut the crap. At this point we don't know whether you or Chinu does a ban; what we do know is that bans are arbitrary and capricious and have nothing to do with the constantly, erraticly changing "thread rules" du jour. Here Message 19786350 Explain that. All I did was call you too on your arbitrary and capricious bans. No slurs, no insults. Just called you to account as you claim the leadership of this country should be called to account. How about this one? I do do not need lessons on freedom of speech etc. etc. Message 20391284 That was when Wolff was banned. Or this: Chinu: I AM BANNIG THOSE WHO DISCUSS SWIFTVET ADS! Message 20442458 Chinu then immediately went over to Ann's thread to attack the Swiftvet ads! Then we have this sterling example of truthseeking: Chinu: I repeat: I welcome any effort from you to expose the lies of the Swiftboat vets. Anything to the contrary is banned. Message 20444555 This was back when Chinu said personal attacks were grounds for banning: Message 19787557 Here's another man's opinion: It goes from cheerleading to debating to bashing, and the "rules" of what is and isn't permissible seem to change with the phases of the moon. Message 20484905 That's a small collection. There are many, many other examples, you lying hypocrite.

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (21703)	9/4/2004 5:06:06 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 173976

I've been up front from the beginning. Would you care to produce ONE POST where you or Chinu announced the other was acting as moderator? Yes? Let's see it.