Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (12605)	9/3/2004 9:39:43 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312379

But in he three years prior did they than as bad as PDG ? That's the question... :Look at eh O&G trusts that made seemingly good hedges before Oil hit almost 50$... They look stupid now (not evil mind you :o) but prior to that companies like AVN.UN were saluted for their hedging smarts.... All a question of viewpoint... Yes if Barrick did some illegal stuff well that's different.... but is that the proven case ? Or is it just stuff some folks don't like ? As I just said in a PM elsewhere I'm ambivalent on this... Unless I see otherwise it's just business.. wishing Barrick ill if they were just protecting shareholder value is ... well I don't need to say it.. regards Kastel