Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sig who wrote (144918)	9/4/2004 8:59:34 AM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 281500

Having just completed my study of the question "which came first the chicken or the egg", I feel qualified to comment on Africa. (The chicken came first but it was not yet a chicken, it was just a conglomeration of cooperating molecules driven by desire to live). The life force being one of consume or be consumed, and the survivors will have developed the ability to survive by growing the various appendages and characteristics seen today in a chicken. I completed my study some years back. I have to disagree. It was the egg that came first and it was layed by something that was not a chicken. The "genetic" modification occurred at the moment of conception. Which disqualifies you from discussing Africa. But what the heck, go ahead anyway. :o) jttmab

To: Sig who wrote (144918)	9/4/2004 9:56:14 AM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So,as far as The Sudan is concerned, you favor the strategy taken by Angelina Jolie's character's husband in "Beyond Borders?" He's the guy who stayed home and took care of their daughters, thereby saving their lives and his own. Angelina Jolie's character and her doctor friend went down to fix things up, interfered with the selection process that enabled the pre-chicken to develop characteristics of a chicken, and got herself killed. You're saying that's a bad idea, right?